|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
Charles Deemer MFA, Playwriting, University of Oregon Writing faculty,
Portland State University (part-time) Retired playwright and screenwriter. Active novelist, librettist and teacher.
cdeemer@yahoo.com.
Links:
Literary archive
Personal home page
Photo
Electronic screenwriting tutorial
Online writing classes
References
Bookstore
Highlights:
Dress Rehearsals
A memoir
Love At Ground Zero

Seven Plays

Oregon Book Award finalist
Blogs by (mostly) creative writers:
"Can We Talk About Me For A Change?"
Playwright Debra Neff Nathans
Inkygirl
Debbie Ridpath Ohi, a weblog for writers (resources)
Silliman's Blog
Ron Silliman, contemporary poetry and poetics
Maud Newton
literary links, amusements, politics, rants
Darren Barefoot
Technical and creative writing, theatre, Dublin
Rob's Writing Pains
Journey of a struggling writer.
Mad, Mad World
Cara Swann, fiction writer, journalist, "reflections on humanity, random news & my life."
Writeright
Random musings on a writer's life and times.
Flaskaland
Barbara Flaska's compilation of the best online articles about music and culture.
Write Of Way
Samantha Blackmon's written musings on writing (composition and rhetoric).
Alexander b. Craghead: blog
Writing, photography, and watercolors.
Rodney's Painted Pen
Rodney Bohen's daily commentary "on the wondrous two legged beast we fondly refer to as mankind."
His pen runneth over.
Frustrated Writer
This one named Nicole.
scribble, scribble, scribble
Journalist Dale Keiger teaches nonfiction scribbling to undergraduate and graduate students at Johns Hopkins University.
The Unofficial Dave Barry Blog
The very one.
The Hive
The official blog of science fiction / horror author Terence West.
William Gibson Blog
Famed author of Neuromancer and Johnny Mnemonic: The Screenplay.
The Word Foundry
Joe Clifford Faust's "blog of a working writer: tracking writing projects, musings on the
creative process, occasional side trips into music, media, politics, religion, etc."
A Writer's Diary
By Cynthia Harrison, who has the good sense to quote Virginia Woolf: "The truth is that writing
is the profound pleasure and being read the superficial."
Bow. James Bow.
The journal of James Bow and his writing.
Ravenlike
Michael Montoure's weblog about writing, primarily horror and speculative fiction.
Globemix
By David Henry, "a poet's weblog from Aberdeen, Scotland."
Modem Noise
By Adrian Bedford, a "fledgling Pro SF Writer, living in Perth, Australia."
boynton
"A wry writerly blog named in honour of a minor character in a minor Shirley Temple film."
Real Writers Bounce
Holly Lisle's blog, "a novelist's roadmap through the art and ordeal of finding the damned words."
2020 Hindsight
By Susan.
downWrite creative
Phil Houtz's notes on the writing life.
Vivid: pieces from a writer's notebook
Blog of Canadian poet Erin Noteboom.
The Literary Saloon
The literary weblog at the complete review.
Rabbit Blog
The rabbit writes on popular culture.
This Girl's Calendar
Momoka writes short stories.
Twists & Turns
Musings by writer Michael Gates.
Plays and Musicals -- A Writer's Introspective
A blog by John D. Nugent - Composer, Playwright, and Artistic Director of the Johnson City Independent Theatre Company
The American Sentimentalist
"Never has any people endured its own tragedy with so little sense of the tragic." Essays by Mark W. Anderson.
Screenwriting By Blog
David C. Daniel writes a screenplay online. "I've decided to publish the process as a way to push myself through it.
From concept to completion, it'll be here."
SeanAlonzo.com
Official site of occult fiction author Sean-Alonzo, exploring symbolism, alternative
history, philosophy, secret
societies and other areas of the esoteric tradition.
Crafty Screenwriting
Maunderings of Alex Epstein, tv scribe, about life, politics, and the tv show I'm co-creating.
Letters From The Home Front
The life of a writer, 21, home schooled, rural living.
Venal Scene
The blog of bite-sized plays inspired by the news (by Dan Trujillo).
'Plaint of the Playwright
Rob Matsushita, a playwright from Wisconsin, "whines a lot."
I Pity Da Fool!
Glenn's adventures in screenwriting.
Time In Tel-Aviv
Hebrew modern literature at its best, by Corinna Hasofferett.
Big Window Robin Reagler's poetry blog.
John Baker's Blog
Author of the Sam Turner and Stone Lewis novels.
Suggest a writer's blog
|
|
|
|
The Writing Life...
"And it came to pass that all the stars in the firmament had ceased to shine. But how was anyone to know?" The Half-Life Conspiracy
|
|
| |
Monday, March 31, 2003
Late news and opinions
3/31/2003 09:34:34 PM |
Recent news and opinions
3/31/2003 04:08:44 PM |
Seabiscuit I'm too young to have memory of Seabiscuit but I grew up with a fondness for horse racing, primarily because Santa Anita was close. The superstar of my childhood was a horse named Citation, the triple crown winner of 1948 (more about Citation), and I can still remember when he was upset by a gray horse named Miche because my grandfather had a bet on the underdog.
Here is a site where you can listen to some of the great races of Seabiscuit in audio: Seabiscuit races on the radio. This is the Internet at its amazing best, bringing up documentation and thrills from yesteryear. Now where is that radio broadcast of Miche upsetting Citation? I did find this information on the net, however: "Jan. 26, 1950: Citation's 16-race win streak came to an end in the La Sorpresa Handicap at Santa Anita. Despite giving 16 pounds to the winner, Miche, Citation, carrying 130 pounds, lost only by a neck." My granddad made quite a bundle, as I remember, and all the kids ate lots of ice cream that night.
3/31/2003 01:48:32 PM |
News update Recent stories of interest:
3/31/2003 07:53:55 AM |
Sunday, March 30, 2003
The Word Spy This is a website "devoted to recently coined words and phrases, old words that are being used in new ways, and existing words that have enjoyed a recent renaissance." Go to Word Spy now.
3/30/2003 07:04:37 PM |
audblog audio post: Today's light verse by Odgen Nash. Ogden Nash links.
3/30/2003 05:21:45 PM |
The tease of Spring A cold front moving in after our spring-like weekend, the usual Oregon tease. This week we'll have rain and lows in the 30s.
I got a lot of lawn work done, mowing yesterday and edging today, enjoying the meditative hum of the reel mower yesterday and hanging onto the rumbling power weed-eater today. The next time we dry out, it will be time to do it all again.
We have a small cottage off the street, surrounded on two sides by trees and orchards and on the other two by neighbors (one hidden by a fence, the other by trees). For living in the city limits, it's rustic and secluded, short of owning an expensive estate. The size is fine for us. I have my office in the basement, and Harriet has her art studio at the back end of the cottage, an addition we added last summer. We also raised the roof and put in skylights. When we recently refinanced, it was assessed at almost 50 grand more than we paid for it only five years ago. We don't expect to be here longer than 7 more years, though -- when we reach our 70s, we expect we'll want a home with less maintenance than our large yard requires.
Have my online class ready to go. It takes more preparation than the University class. Have met three of my seven students so far, one in Spain, one in New Zealand, and a teenager in the U.S. It's always an international mix. Try arranging a live chat with people scattered all around the world!
The new term officially starts tomorrow. I'm ready. Onward.
3/30/2003 05:16:06 PM |
News update Recent news items worth noting:
- The future outlook, sober and reasoned analysis of where we've been, where we are, and what might happen, by a retired military officer.
- Terrified Iraqis. "In public, we always pledge our allegiance to Saddam, but in our hearts we feel something else." Story by Essam Al-Ghalib, Arab News War Correspondent.
- 1000s volunteer for suicide attacks. And how do you stop them?
3/30/2003 11:32:11 AM |
The novel: plan of attack Here's how I'm going to attack the conversion of the script Love in the Ruins to a novel. I'm going to do it in 2-3 page segments, taking that much of script and rewriting it (and no doubt expanding it) into fiction prose. I do this 30-50 times and I have a draft of the novel. Maybe I can get it done before summer. I don't know if I'll set aside the novel Character I've been working on (over 100 pages into a draft) or try doing both at once. I'm usually pretty good at working on many projects at once, so I might begin this way and see how it goes. But I think I want to make Ruins the top priority since the story is more topical and because I actually have the entire story down in writing, which means it should go much more quickly than the other. Also, with Character, I'm still not sure I have the right tone for the storytelling. Onward.
3/30/2003 08:45:56 AM |
Movie culture I've just started reading A Year at the Movies by Kevin Murphy, in which the author recounts his adventures through movie culture after seeing at least one movie a day for an entire year. The book, recommended to me by a student, is a fun romp through same. I recommend it.
I also heard an intriguing book review this morning on NPR: Is This Heaven?, a story of the magic that continues to happen at the movie site of Field of Dreams, now a tourist attraction. Sons meet long-lost fathers, a woman who dreams she must have a hotdog at the site at midnight does so -- and meets her future husband in the process. Sounds like another romp, this one through the hope of positive magic, not bad medicine for the times. Not sure how well this book is doing since my library doesn't have it and hasn't ordered it. I don't think I want to read it enough to buy it.
3/30/2003 08:40:37 AM |
Iraqis in exile On the radio this morning I heard a BBC interview with Iraqi women in exile in Egypt. They have changed from anti-Saddam to pro-Saddam because of the war. What I found fascinating is that they expressed their anti-Saddam roots without any reference to tyranny or the "war crimes" of his rule; they could have been Democrats talking about Republicans or vice versa. There was absolutely no outrage about the acts of the Saddamists.
This suggests many things. Perhaps the tribal and class structure of Iraq makes people (many people?) immune to the atrocities committed there, which have been well documented. If so, then the task of the coalition will be more difficult because of it. And the longer the war lasts, the more difficult it will be to win the hearts and minds of Iraqi people who initially and naturally are against the regime. Who will be in greater numbers, those who say bring on the war, nothing can be worse than this, or those in whom a sense of nationalism rises against the invading coalition? For all the confidence of our military and political leaders, to me this war looks far from easily won.
3/30/2003 08:34:35 AM |
The case for "Isolationism" In April, 2000, Earl C. Ravenal argued that "Instead of continuing the forward deployment and contingent use of its military forces in a vain effort to defend a lengthy roster of client states and maintain an illusory global order, the United States should concentrate on developing strike warfare—long-range retaliatory capabilities—to be used to defend only its indisputably vital interests." Full text of Foreign Policy Brief No. 57.
This argument is too late to apply to Iraq, of course, but perhaps not to what the future holds after Iraq. Of course, it was written before 9/11.
3/30/2003 03:58:15 AM |
Dark Mission I'm writing the libretto to an opera with composer John Nugent. Our story is based on what history calls the Whitman Massacre (information here) but which we see as a tragedy of cultures in conflict as missionaries try to Christianize natives whom they consider to be "heathens" needing to be saved. We see a rationale in the native uprising that killed the missionary and doctor Marcus Whitman, his wife Narcissa, and others in 1847.
Are we on a "dark mission" in Iraq? Is our attempt to democratize the Middle East as misguided as the attempt to Christianize natives in America (many of you probably would disagree with me on this point)? We shall see. Before we do, however, we are on "a mission" that I consider noble and humane, to free a people suffering under the rule of a barbaric tyrant, a tyrant who also presents a long-range threat to our own culture. This is why I believe in the war. But after the war comes the peace, a very complex situation.
In the meantime, this term I hope to make more good headway on my libretto, perhaps even finishing it. I am sending scenes in free verse along the way, to which John sets music. Then I will have to rewrite to match the more important flow of the music itself. It's an exciting project.
3/30/2003 03:34:08 AM |
Saturday, March 29, 2003
Saddamist tactics From USA Today:
"One overriding impression left on U.S. troops by the first week's combat is that the Iraqis have developed an elaborate set of "dirty" tactics to capitalize on Americans' reluctance to endanger civilian lives. According to troops here, Iraqi forces have:
- Forced women and children to act as human shields in buildings occupied by Iraqi troops.
- Located headquarters in schools, day care facilities and, in one case in Nasiriyah, a children's hospital. More than one Iraqi prisoner of war has told American troops they do not need to worry about bombing schools because the schools have all been turned over to Iraqi militia forces.
- Lured U.S. forces into an ambush by pretending to surrender.
- Positioned artillery in residential areas so that even when radar systems locate it, U.S. commanders won't pummel it.
- Used ambulances with the Red Crescent symbol — the equivalent of the Red Cross — as personnel carriers, ferrying reinforcements to Iraqi positions under the noses of U.S. troops.
Worn U.S. uniforms. - Forced women and children to retrieve dead Iraqi troops and their weapons.
- Forced Iraqi civilian men and regular soldiers to fight by threatening to kill them and their families if they refused."
Read entire story.
3/29/2003 08:33:31 PM |
Therapy or Politics? LA Weekly writer Marc Cooper, who is against the war, has written perhaps the most sensible words I've seen to come out of the peace movement recently. Read them now.
3/29/2003 07:11:49 PM |
Dorothy Parker (again) Today's light verse is by Dorothy Parker (links). I'm presenting a dramatic appreciation of Parker and her work this summer at the Unitarian Church. In the past I've done other dramatic tributes there: It's a way to keep my feet wet in theater now that I call myself "retired" as a playwright. Putting together the Parker show, which I'll begin soon, will be fun, I think. I also produce and direct the piece. They go over well, I think, because I have a long rehearsal period for what amounts to a staged reading. Many of the actors are practically off book when they perform. And there are some dynamite readers/performers in the congregation. This time I also had a composer friend set two Parker poems to original music for the choir. I need to write this in April so I can cast it in May. Onward.
3/29/2003 06:54:26 PM |
audblog audio post: Today's light verse by Dorothy Parker.
3/29/2003 06:45:44 PM |
Small pleasures I really enjoyed mowing the lawn this afternoon, at least until company arrived. Company and meditation don't mix. Later the mail came and brought more good news, a check I've been waiting over a month for. Taking it to the bank ATM to deposit, I rolled down the car window -- the sun is out today! I can't remember the last time I drove with the window down. Of course, this is Oregon, and the forecast for next week is rain and more rain. But today is a reminder of spring.
Counting my blessings. Having never lived under tyranny, I find it hard to imagine the horror of those in Iraq who have reached such limits that they prefer our invasion, even if they die, to our reluctance to do what it takes to rid them of Saddam. But if not now, when? We already are fighting with the 7 year-olds to whom we passed the buck a decade ago. At least this time we aren't passing the buck to our children again. We have to hold our resolve. But it's bound to get a lot uglier than it already is. We need to counter the horror of war with clear communication of the horror of Saddamism to remind the world, and ourselves, why we are there.
3/29/2003 03:20:51 PM |
Smuggled tape to be shown on ABC This may be a break-through in challenging the propaganda of the Saddamists. From the Command Post blog: "Assyrian Ken Joseph Jr., a committed peace activist, recently visited Iraq as part of his effort to prevent the war with Iraq. He came away convinced that he was completely wrong, by the very people of Iraq who he visited to save from the impending war. Joseph claims to have brought back tapes of ordinary Iraqis who wish for war to end the brutal tyranny of the Baathist regime. These tapes will be shown by Barbara Walters next week, according to Joseph's web site."
Joseph's story is at his website, don't miss this. An excerpt: "From a former member of the Army to a person working with the police to taxi drivers to store owners to mothers to government officials without exception when allowed to speak freely the message was the same - `Please bring on the war. We are ready. We have suffered long enough. We may lose our lives but some of us will survive and for our children's sake please, please end our misery.'"
Info on ABC showing of tape.
If the cliche "the truth will set us free" really has bite, the more hard evidence the yet-unconvinced get about the brutality of the Saddamists, the better chance to change minds and win allies to the cause of overthrowing this brutal regime. This sounds like a program not to miss.
3/29/2003 01:39:30 PM |
A stunning gesture "Iraqi civilians fleeing heavy fighting have stunned and delighted hungry US marines in central Iraq by giving them food, as guerrilla attacks continue to disrupt coalition supply lines to the rear." Read full story.
One group of approaching civilians feeds you, the next shoots you. What a war.
3/29/2003 11:41:43 AM |
Stressed out? These are stressful times for all of us. By my guess, the war front in Iraq is going to get worse before it gets better, especially now that the Saddamists are adding suicide-bombers into their active strategy. Here are some links to help you deal with stress:
I find that managing this blog does a lot to relieve my own stress. And this afternoon I'm mowing the lawn, activity that will do the same.
3/29/2003 11:35:03 AM |
Need company? I don't care what your opinion is, you are bound to find support for it in these 40 pages of links to op-ed pieces and editorials from around the world, courtesy of Yahoo! News. Go there now.
3/29/2003 11:22:25 AM |
Iraqis losing hope Some Iraqis in southern Iraq are losing hope that we will liberate them. They expected more from us and sooner. Read the story.
In a similar story in today's Oregonian, Sudarsan Raghavan interviewed refugees who managed to escape from Basra. They, too, are impatient with us. "...many refugees hoped U.S. and British soldiers would enter Basra. 'Otherwise, we will all die at the hands of Saddam,' he said."
This is the growing horror: we are reluctant to be as aggressive as we need to be for fear of putting civilian lives in danger, even though many of these civilians seem to prefer this risk to the consequences of our being less aggressive than it takes to win. As I've suggested before, advances in civilization seem to plant the seeds of destruction, and cultures become too squeamish for their own good. The problem in Baghdad is the problem in Basra magnified many times over. Do we bite the bullet and enter the city? Or do we show patience and surround the city and hope for an uprising? How do we protect civilians? To listen to the Iraqis quoted in two stories above, they want us to bite the bullet and invade the city, their own risk be damned. This, of course, would result in many deaths, the worst kind of publicity. What's more important, our image or the fate of the Iraqi people?
3/29/2003 10:16:02 AM |
Dry weather! Forecast today is for our second consecutive day of dry weather before the rains return tomorrow. So today is the day to mow the lawn, one of my favorite activities since I bought a manual reel mower a few years back. And the women's basketball tournament picks up again today. Looking good. Onward.
3/29/2003 05:48:50 AM |
Strategy First there was an announcement of a 4-6 day pause in trying to secure Baghdad. If so, why announce it to the enemy (unless it is a ploy)? Now it's being denied.
What we need is a Trojan horse. What we need is some ingenious strategy to get into and take Baghdad with a minimum of lives lost, especially considering the Saddamists' strategy of using the civilian population as human shields. We also need patience. But another news report has the DOD putting pressure on the military to take Baghdad quickly. Civilian politicians and military leaders typically see the situation differently.
Also in the news, reports of the first uprisings in Baghdad. This is one report I hope is true.
This is a momentous time in history. We could really use a creative military genius, the kind of mind that came up with the Trojan horse idea. I don't see any candidates but would love to be surprised. Saddam is determined to make the battle for Baghdad a street-by-street, door-by-door affair, putting everyone including civilians at great risk, and if we let him dictate the conditions of the fight, I worry this would be a great mistake. Who has a Trojan horse idea?
From Blogs of War comes a letter of support from Poland: "You are doeing good job! It's the same situation as in Poland in 1939 year when Hitler and attack my country - Poland. At now we have to get freedom for Iraq people. People in Poland know it well - in 1939 France and other european country left us alone and II world war has been start. If in those time all the Europe strike on Hitler there wasn't be many dead people." Amen.
3/29/2003 05:31:28 AM |
Friday, March 28, 2003
The Lessons of History The Lessons of History is a slim volume by Will and Ariel Durant. It presents a summary of their many volumes of world history, a series of ten volumes bringing the story of civilization to 1789. They then asked themselves the question, Of what use have your studies been? They try to answer it in this short book.
Here are excerpts from their chapter called "History and War."
War is one of the constants of history and has not diminished with civilization or democracy. In the last 3421 years of recorded history only 268 have seen no war. We have acknowledged war as at present the ultimate form of competition and natural selection in the human species.
...The general smiles. "You have forgotten all the lessons of history," he says, "and all that nature of man which you described. Some conflicts are too fundamental to be resolved by negotiation; and during the prolonged negotiations (if history may be our guide) subversion would go on. A world order will come not by a gentlemen's agreement, but through so decisive a victory by one of the great powers that it will be able to dictate and enforce international law, as Rome did from Augustus to Aurelius. Such interludes of widespread peace are unnatural and exceptional; they will soon be ended by changes in the distribution of military power. You have told us that man is a competitive animal, that his states must be like himself, and that natural selection now operates on an international plane. States will unite in basic co-operation only when they are in common attacked from without. Perhaps we are now restlessly moving toward that higher plateau of competition; we may make contact with ambitious species on other planets or stars; soon thereafter there will be interplanetary war. Then, and only then, will we of this earth be one."
3/28/2003 09:31:08 PM |
The optimists An optimistic (overly optimistic?) assessment of the war from Ralph Peters in the NY Post on March 24th. Access now.
Along the same lines, Newt Gingrich writes today in USA Today that "this is a remarkably successful campaign." Full story.
Without a doubt, embedded journalists can only report on the small portion of action they experience, and on TV it can be difficult to see the larger picture. The worst consequence of TV coverage, in my view, has to do with time: broadcasting a war 24/7 is rather like waiting and watching water come to a boil, a strain on one's patience. Winning this war will require considerable time and patience and resolve, and it remains to be seen if the American majority can bear this burden.
3/28/2003 08:40:23 PM |
The Human Experience of Wars in the Arts and Literature Syllabus and comprehensive reading list for Vesna Danilovic's Political Science class at Texas A&M. A few hot links. Access now.
3/28/2003 05:41:50 PM |
War Poems & Manuscripts of Wilfred Owen From World War I, the classic war poems ... access now.
3/28/2003 05:37:57 PM |
Iraqi forgiveness From CBS, an amazing story that speaks to how much some Iraqi people hate the Saddamists. Read or download.
3/28/2003 05:26:25 PM |
Benefit of the doubt Another thing that drives me up to wall is how much more quickly some in the Left give the Saddamists the "benefit of the doubt" without giving the Bush administration the benefit of the doubt. Look at the civilian casualties at the market in Baghdad. The Saddamists say it was our missile. We say we don't know what it was but that we didn't have a target in the marketplace. We suggest an errant Iraqi missile or anti-aircraft fire. The fact is, repeat, the fact is, we don't know what happened. Yes, missiles can make mistakes, theirs and ours. But we also know the Saddamists deliberately fire on their own people: they've done this in the past and British soldiers have witnessed them doing this on civilians, including women and children, trying to flee Basra. They fire on their own people when it serves their purpose to do so, so it is not stretching credulity to suggest the Saddamists may be targeting their own marketplace deliberately for its propaganda value. I'm not saying this is what happened but I am saying that this is more likely than the official explanation of the Saddamists, that we are deliberately choosing civilian targets. If we did it, and we may well have, it was a tragic accident. This is war. Tragic accidents are to be expected.
The bottom line is, we don't know what happened at this point. Yet many are quick to jump on the official explanation of the Saddamists, giving them the benefit of the doubt, and not giving the Bush administration the benefit of the doubt even when our explanation is less accusatory, more tentative, and more sensible. We, after all, admit our casualties from friendly fire. The Saddamists never do this. Why do people give Saddam the benefit of the doubt?
3/28/2003 02:45:15 PM |
Columbia professor calls for U.S. defeat This is the kind of rhetoric that drives me up the wall: at a teach-in at Columbia, a professor called for the defeat of the U.S. and the victory of "the Iraqi people," as if the forces defending Saddam represented the will of the Iraqi people, which is the equivalent of saying Saddam is not a barbaric tyrant at all. And students loudly applauded when he said, "If we really believe that this war is criminal ... then we have to believe in the victory of the Iraqi people and the defeat of the U.S. war machine."
If he said this in Iraq, his tongue would be cut out and he would be left in the town square to bleed to death. The only reason he gets to say it safely here is that countless people gave their lives in defense of liberty and our way of life.
My dictionary defines treason, in part, as: "the offense of attempting by overt acts to overthrow the government of the state to which the offender owes allegiance ..." A belief is not an overt act. Is a rousing speech, like shouting "fire" in a theater, an overt act? I don't know. Probably not. In these matters it is best to err on the side of liberty. But his remarks still drive me up the wall. Read full story.
3/28/2003 01:15:59 PM |
audblog audio post: Today's light verse by Ogden Nash. Ogden Nash links.
3/28/2003 12:49:13 PM |
Life goes on Finished my syllabus. Off to take it to the copy center. Also did a polish of the screenplay after some great feedback. Someone whose opinion I value a great deal loves the script and the story, and she had excellent suggestions on what to beef up in the novel. Still some reading to finish before the term starts but I have time.
3/28/2003 11:09:10 AM |
International Alliance for Justice condemns the exactions perpetrated by the death squads of Saddam Hussein’s regime This organization, located in France, joins the movement to charge Saddam with war crimes, writing in part:
"...repression is still taking place against the Iraqi population in order to prevent any uprising attempt and to eliminate the elements that could potentially resist the regime. It confirms what many Iraqis have always claimed: the Iraqi population cannot get rid of such a system without support.
"International Alliance for Justice repeats its condemnation of the repression of the population by the militias of Saddam Hussein’s regime, at a time when the regime’s propaganda is trying to make the world believe that the population is resisting. Iraqis have no other choice today than to protect their own lives and their relatives’, who are threatened by groups known for their extreme violence towards the population." The organization also reprimands the international community for not doing more to help the Iraqi people. Full story.
3/28/2003 11:03:50 AM |
Middle eastern democracy Five views on its possibility. Read or download now.
3/28/2003 04:58:08 AM |
What To Do With the Presence of Evil Among Us? Diane Cole's review of Evil in Modern Thought: An Alternative History of Philosophy by Susan Neiman. Read or download now.
3/28/2003 04:56:54 AM |
Thursday, March 27, 2003
Tiger Woods With all the press Hollywood actors get for speaking against the war, it's refreshing to see a celebrity take a stand in support of the goal of our troops. From Tiger Woods' official website: I have great respect for the men and women fighting overseas to protect our way of life in Iraq and other parts of the world. As the son of an Army officer, I understand the strength, courage and discipline required to successfully carry out their missions in hostile environments and feel tremendous pride they are representing us.
Obviously, no one likes war. Our Congress and President tried hard to avoid the use of force, but ultimately decided it was the best course of action. I like the assertiveness shown by President Bush and think we owe it to our political and military leaders, along with our brave soldiers to be as supportive as possible during these difficult and trying times. I just wanted to take this opportunity to let our forces know that I am thinking about you and wishing you and your families the best.
3/27/2003 08:40:24 PM |
Iran Students for democracy in Iran call for boycott of official government anti-war (i.e. coalition war in Iraq) rally. Read the story. So not everyone in that part of the world is against us, which is the impression you can get from much of the media.
3/27/2003 08:19:18 PM |
Walk the walk Because of security precautions, you can't send care packages to anonymous troops any more. But there's still a way to send them items and gifts. If you care about the troops and want to support them, here are two secure, approved ways to do so:
- Operation Interdependence. It takes a couple weeks to be approved after you register at this site. You will be approved to send items for the troops via a regional coordinator.
- USO Care Package Donations are a bit easier. You can send items direct from manufacturers or you can donate $25 for a care package, including paying online.
3/27/2003 05:46:34 PM |
Alice in Wonderland This looks like a very comprehensive site about Alice in Wonderland, coming at the classic from a variety of perspectives.
3/27/2003 01:46:17 PM |
Smiling in tough times Need some political humor? Here are some links:
3/27/2003 01:35:20 PM |
Defending freedom I stumbled across this letter to the editor by a student at the University of Western Ontario on September 21, 2001. I recommend it. Read the letter now.
I'm reminded of what Thomas Jefferson wrote in a letter: "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants. It is its natural manure."
3/27/2003 01:00:35 PM |
Canada: Try Saddam for genocide Canada did not join the coalition. But get this: "The Canadian house of commons called unanimously on Thursday for the establishment of an international tribunal to try Iraqi President Saddam Hussein and other Iraqi officials for genocide and other crimes." Full story.
Okay -- so how do you do this unless you confront the Saddamists head-on? You think he's going to show up voluntarily? Maybe it's time to join the coalition, Canada.
3/27/2003 11:50:28 AM |
Pictures and words We are losing the propaganda war, in part, because the Saddamists and their sympathizers are showing more horrifying images than we are. We are too prim and proper. An example is when the networks and cable decided not to show video of captured and killed coalition troops, some of whom had a close-range bullet hole in the center of their foreheads, evidence of execution. We needed to see those images. We need to show the American public and the world the visual images of the depravity of the Iraqi regime and its Saddamistic goons. It's time to take the gloves off in the propaganda war.
Images can be heart-warming, too. On Sixty Minutes II last night was a story about bringing relief supplies to a town liberated by the coalition, and the overwhelming welcome by most of the Iraqis there. Especially moving were the faces of the children, enough to bring tears to one tough Marine being interviewed, who said, "This is why I am here."
Sixty Minutes II had a chilling story as well, an interview with an Iraqi officer who defected in 1996 and helped organize the paramilitary troops willing to put down their lives for Saddam, those who have been causing us so much trouble in the south. His description of their training and tactics reminded me of how tough our task will be, how heroic our soldiers must be, and how much support we must give them.
Perhaps we choose sides in this war according to our belief in Evil. Those we have a hard time accepting that evil exists, or that Saddam is as depraved as history and facts tell us he is, those who like to give people the benefit of the doubt, who like to say that all people have something good in them ... these same who were late to condemn Stalin and Hitler, also are late to condemn Saddam or to condemn him with rhetoric without bite, unwilling to walk their talk ... these people see the world as a nicer place than a cold clear look at world history tell us it is.
On the other hand, those who see evil everywhere, who believe everything not in agreement with capitalism or democracy or whatever their most cherished principle might be is evil by definition ... these people see themselves as more superior and righteous than they are among the world's families. We ourselves, in our own history, have acted this role before.
But this is not one of those times -- at least not yet. There is early evidence that many Iraqi people will welcome us once they can trust that they are safe from repercussions, that this time we are not going to abandon them, that this time the Saddamists will not return. They have to feel safe to make this leap, however, and we have to do whatever it takes to make them feel safe from Saddam's revenge.
3/27/2003 11:22:20 AM |
Literature and war A great op-ed piece in the NY Times today. Thanks, Mary.
3/27/2003 11:03:54 AM |
Translating Dante There is a new surge of interest in Dante, with numerous new translations of his works coming out. I wrote earlier about John Ciardi and my wonderful experience as an undergraduate at UCLA hearing him read from his translation of The Inferno. Compare his translation to others. Here are three versions of the first three lines of Canto V:
So I descended from the first enclosure down to the second circle, that which girdles less space but grief more great, that goads to weeping.
So I descended from first to second circle-- Which girdles a smaller space and greater pain, Which spurs more lamentation. [Minos the dreadful]
So we went down to the second ledge alone; a smaller circle of so much greater pain the voice of the damned rose in a bestial moan.
The last is by John Ciardi (the first by Allen Mandelbaum, the second by Robert Pinsky), definitely the one I prefer although this is clearly a matter of taste.
Translating literature is no easy task as I learned when I translated Chekhov's The Seagull for my ambitious Seagull Hyperdrama. (Don't know what hyperdrama is? Now you do.) I translated it so I would own it and could use it in my hyperdrama, but the task took me far longer, years, than I expected, mostly because my Russian was so rusty. Plays actually are easier to translate than other works, I think, because of so much dialogue in them.
One of my reading goals before I pass on is to read Chapman's Homer, both volumes. They came out in paperback some time ago but I haven't had the block of time and concentration to take it on yet. I would like to follow this with Kazankakis sequel to The Odyssey. Now there's an ambitious reading project, three weighty volumes in a row. Maybe I'd better begin soon.
Back to Dante ... here are some links:
3/27/2003 09:36:05 AM |
The rules of war I'm fascinated by the concept of "the rules of war," which has been in the news lately in the context that the Iraqis are not playing by "the rules." Why on earth would someone facing superior fire power and defeat play by some pre-determined rules? What are the origin of these rules in the first place?
It seems "the rules of war" are an attempt to justify our worst half to our best half. We forever deny two aspects of our nature from which social problems arise: aggression and sex. Our aggressive natures lead to war, more than peace an institution in human affairs over the centuries of world history, and our sexual natures lead to prostitution, more than marriage an institution in human affairs.
At any rate, I've done some snooping about the rules of war and here are some links:
- The Rules of war, a list of them.
- Rules of war, a website by the Canadian Red Cross.
- Revisiting 'Rules of War' in age of terrorism. A book review. "The rules of warfare were developed in Stone-Age times ... and the goal is to make the enemy do something he doesn't want to do," said Bevin Alexander, a professor of history at Longwood University in Farmville, Va., talking about his book, How Wars are Won: The Thirteen Rules of War From Ancient Greece to the War on Terrorism. Here "rules" is used in the sense of "strategies," not in the sense of "humanitarian restrictions" as above.
War is horrible, always has been and always will be, and it gets more horrible the less "personal" it gets, the more we develop technology that lets us kill from a distance, without personal face-to-face conflict. However, even the horror of primitive war did not result in its ban. Modern horrors of war, whatever their motivations, from the Crusades to the Holocaust to Hiroshima, have not resulted in any kind of permanent peace. The only way "war" makes any sense as human activity, which indeed through history has been a major activity, is to understand that it must be natural, it must be wired into our behavior. In this context, "the rules of war" are an attempt to mitigate this inevitable tendency with behaviors that will decrease its horrible consequences.
But why should someone losing play by the rules? And aren't the rules themselves culturally determined? On TV last night a Marine complained about the hit-and-run guerilla tactics of the Iraqi paramilitary groups. "Why won't they fight like men?" he asked. A primitive warrior could make the same complaint: "These cowardly Americans drop bombs on us from the sky, why won't they fight face-to-face, one man with a sword against another, why won't they quit hiding behind their machines and come out and fight like men?"
3/27/2003 05:18:41 AM |
Wednesday, March 26, 2003
audblog audio post: Today's light verse by Ogden Nash.
3/26/2003 06:41:57 PM |
Ogden Nash Today's (belated) light verse is by Ogden Nash. Links:
3/26/2003 06:35:42 PM |
Encouraging news, if true ... In a day without much encouraging news, here may be some (encouraging from the point of view of overthrowing Saddam):
Iraqis tell allies where to bomb their city By Martin Bentham and Patrick Bishop near Basra (Filed: 27/03/2003)
Iraqi civilians were reported to be emerging from Basra yesterday to pass critical intelligence information to British-led forces to aid attacks against Saddam Hussein's forces within their own city.
British intelligence officers said there had been a steady stream of information coming from the population in Basra, Iraq's second largest city, about the movements and activities of paramilitaries loyal to Saddam.
That information was proving crucial in identifying targets for British and American attack aircraft on bombing missions over the city.
"We are receiving a lot of information from inside the city," said one British officer. "Most of it is coming from Iraqis fed up with the regime and who are sneaking out across the bridges to tell us what is going on in the city. It is very risky but the fact that so many are prepared to do this indicates the level of opposition to Saddam within Basra," he said. Full story.
3/26/2003 06:20:28 PM |
Poetry daily You get a new poem a day at Poetry Daily, most previously published in a poetry journal. There are archives, too.
3/26/2003 04:00:53 PM |
On the personal front ... Another quick rewrite of the script and a final printing, a copy for my wife and her feedback. Next week I'll start the novel. Haven't decided whether I'll do more with the script-as-script or not. Otherwise, I'm already behind on the reading I have to get done this week. And good basketball games coming up: Arizona-Notre Dame tomorrow, Oklahoma-Butler Friday, and I'm rooting for the underdogs.
3/26/2003 03:45:28 PM |
How to lie with statistics One of the best courses I took in high school was a senior current affairs elective in which a wonderful teacher, Paul Finot, used (among other things) a book called How to Lie with Statistics. In this class we elected a fictitious person as student body vice-president with a write-in campaign. It was incredible.
All this rushes back with a current example of lying with statistics. Maybe you read that American confidence in the war has faltered from 71% on Saturday to 38% on Monday. This was misleading: try from 80% Thursday (or 93% Saturday) to 85% on Monday). It's how your define your categories, folks. Details here. Again, this shows how all of us manipulate the "facts" to reinforce what we already believe -- which is to be expected in times of great flux and confusion. Everybody probably should just shut up until this is over. Of course, I won't.
3/26/2003 01:44:45 PM |
BBC blog This BBC war blog is the most frequently updated war news site I've found.
3/26/2003 12:23:13 PM |
Propaganda wars We are fighting an enemy in Iraq that we're not used to. They use hospitals for military storage areas, they remove uniforms for civilian clothes, they wave white flags and then open fire on approaching troops. They fire on their own people when it's in their interests.
At the same time, we make mistakes. We kill our own in friendly fire. Clearly it's possible we kill innocent civilians by mistake.
But it's hard to say what happened in Baghdad with the bombing of a neighborhood -- our mistake or their propaganda. Many Iraqis clearly believe it was our doing, which may be all that matters. If it wasn't our doing, it's brilliant propaganda. If we did, it's an example of the unfortunate accidents that happen in war.
In the short run, it is difficult to know what is actually going on. Reports from the field become contradictory. Propaganda from both sides does not clarify matters. It's hard to present or find hard evidence in the middle of a war. Consequently we all probably sift out the news that reinforces what we already believe and dismiss the rest.
3/26/2003 12:14:25 PM |
College filmmakers Christian Moger has started a website for college filmmakers: College-Film.com. A central cyberstation for discussion, networking, uploading and reviewing scripts and films, and more. The success of a website like this depends on how well it builds a sense of community. If you are a college filmmaker, or thinking of becoming one, check this out.
3/26/2003 10:05:46 AM |
If we win, if we lose ... More than once the U.S. has won the war and lost the peace. Of course, Iraq is not "the war," it is a front in the context of a much larger war. But clearly many dangers await us, no matter what happens in Iraq.
If we "win" in Iraq, which means overthrowing Saddam, what happens next depends on many things: will the Iraqi people welcome his departure, as we assume? Since I cannot imagine why anyone not in a privileged position would enjoy living under tyranny, I assume so. But will they also welcome us staying on as guardians? This is where we have to be very careful and not make the mistake we made in the Philippines, being blinded by our own sense of moral righteousness in helping "the poor Iraqis." We have to give them an immediate sense of being in control of their own lives, which after all is what freedom is about.
If we lose in Iraq (and here is an American who believe our defeat is inevitable), then our challenges are even more profound. Personally I think we then need to reassess our assumption of being a world power and policeman. I think we need to put our own national self-preservation over the well being of our allies in other parts of the world. I think we need to define a new kind of enlightened isolationism where we emphasize defense and self-reliance, including economic self-reliance (of course, international corporations would have none of this). This would include very strict immigration laws since, after all, our open borders are one way in which terrorists easily enter the country -- and if we are not going to go after them, then we have to make it harder for them to come to us.
There seem to be many more things that can go wrong than can go right. However, this does not mean all is lost in the short run -- yet. My larger concern, as I've stated, is with our so-called allies, those refusing to stand up to Saddam. I don't know what it would take to turn them around. Maybe this: victory, the articulation and evidence of his barbaric regime (including trials for war crimes), and the winning of the Iraqi people who would consider us liberators. Today this seems a long way off. But, in my view, not yet impossible to hope for. (Of course, I'm the guy now rooting for Butler in the NCAA tournament!)
3/26/2003 09:48:30 AM |
A future problem? Mention of McKinley and the Philippines earlier came to mind when I read the following this morning:
TEHRAN (AFP) - The Iraqi opposition has called on Iraqis to prepare for an uprising against President Saddam Hussein (news - web sites)'s regime and the army to desert, a spokesman for the main Shiite opposition group said. Mohsen Hakim of the Iran-based Supreme Assembly of the Islamic Revolution in Iraq (news - web sites) (SARII) quoted a statement put out by the leadership of the various opposition groups after a meeting which ended late Tuesday at Salaheddin, near Arbil in Iraqi Kurdistan.
Hakim said the seven-point statement asked the US and British coalition fighting to topple Saddam and the international community to recognise a transitional government and parliament to be installed by the opposition after the war.
The opposition asked the coalition to begin negotiations with these bodies for the disarmament of Iraq and prepare a timetable for the withdrawal of foreign forces from the country, he added. This is reminiscent of what happened in the Philippines. The "opposition," led by Aguinaldo, expected to become active in installing a transitional government. When "the liberators," the U.S. under McKinley, denied them this power and responsibility, they in turn rebelled against us, and an even bloodier war than the one with Spain began. If this history gets repeated in Iraq, we have a very bad scenario indeed: First we fight the forces of Saddam to liberate "the people," then we fight "the people" who don't want us setting up their government for them.
3/26/2003 08:13:11 AM |
McKinley It all started with President William McKinley. He was in office during the war against Spain, when we "liberated" Cuba before creating the conditions that led to a communist revolution there. But the most telling moment was in the Philippines (about which I wrote a history play, A Brown Man's Burden). The issue was this: after fighting Spain to free the Philippines, should we abandon them or colonize them? Considerable debate was heated on both sides of the issue.
McKinley had a dream. He dreamed it was his Christian duty to save "our little brown brothers" from their own inability to govern themselves. As it happened, the leader of the rebels against Spain, Aguinaldo, was a student of and admirer of the U.S. Declaration of Independence and Constitution and patterned his fight for his country's freedom after our own -- and so felt betrayed when the U.S. decided to stay on and oversee government in the Philippines after kicking Spain out.
What if the isolationists had won the argument as the 19th C. became the 20th C.? What if we had decided a virtual colony in the Philippines was not in our best interests? This, to be sure, was the start of our adventures beyond our borders and the first step of our striving to become a world power.
Mark Twain was very much against this tendency and the war with Spain. He thought we should mind our own business. This is what inspired him to write in Puddn'head Wilson (and I paraphrase from memory): Columbus Day: It was nice to discover America. It would have been so much nicer to have missed it.
Links: What we do today is rooted in what we did yesterday.
3/26/2003 03:36:17 AM |
Politicians, soldiers, journalists Although I see very little in common between the wars in Vietnam and Iraq, one thing they do share is the difficulty in learning what actually is going on. This is true even now in the most media-covered war in history. Something else they share is this: politicians always will put the best spin possible on events. Before the war started, some of them such as the Vice-President were suggesting a cake walk, our troops immediately welcomed as liberators. Military leaders were more realistic but even they have been surprised by the level of resistance so far. What defeated us in Vietnam was guerilla warfare, and this appears to be the strategy of Saddam's forces. We shouldn't be surprised. Indeed, before the war started, I recall seeing news of training for this very tactic.
Although embedded media are everywhere covering this war, I'm not sure this raises the truth level of the information we get. All reporting in very limited by necessity, so it's hard to get a grasp of the big picture. It's also pretty obvious whether a given reporter is pro or con this action by the rhetoric s/he uses.
At the moment, Basra may be a sort of test case in miniature of what the conflict in Baghdad may look like. Urban and guerilla warfare, a civilian population in hostage. Today may be a key day as the British attempt to gain control in the city. If they do, it will be revealing to see how the civilian population responds. But the urban conflict may take days, god forbid even weeks. Tough days ahead.
3/26/2003 02:59:50 AM |
Tuesday, March 25, 2003
Skewering Michael Moore Now that Moore has won an Oscar for best documentary, consider this analytical look at his film by David T. Hardy in Bowling for Columbine: Documentary or Fiction?
In responding to a similar charge of fraudulent information in is best-selling book Stupid White Men, Moore replied to CNN's Lou Dobbs:
"You know, look, this is a book of political humor. So, I mean, I don't respond to that sort of stuff, you know," he said.
"Glaring inaccuracies?" Mr. Dobbs said.
"No, I don't. Why should I? How can there be inaccuracy in comedy?" However, I have not heard Moore or anyone else claim that Bowling for Columbine is supposed to be viewed not as a documentary but as a comedy.
Anyone seen a reasoned reply to Hardy's analysis?
3/25/2003 08:53:22 PM |
FADE OUT Two very sweet words to put at the bottom of a script! Finished a good rewrite. This is the draft I'll base the novel on. Although this is unmarketable, I might enter the script in a competition just for the hell of it. But I'd like to start the short novel as soon as possible. If we win the war, if the Iraqis love us, this subject matter may even become fashionable!
3/25/2003 03:41:06 PM |
Rewriting Rewrote the first 30 pages of the script this morning and will keep at it for a while, hoping to get to the midpoint. Love in the Ruins is a Romeo & Juliet clone, a star-crossed romance between an American student and a Muslim woman against the backdrop of 9/11. The woman, Hayaam, is a character I am falling in love with, a Muslim feminist (yes, they exist!), bright and articulate, feisty and confident that she is more liberated than American women (whom she sees as slaves to sexist fashion) ... this is an interesting script to write in time of war, part therapy, part wishful-thinking. Onward.
3/25/2003 11:29:06 AM |
Blogs of War Here's the best site I've seen for up-to-the-minute war news, Blogs of war, with a minimum of editorializing. From this morning: "The people have risen up against Saddam Hussein's regime and the Iraqi soldiers who are still within the city are starting to fire mortars upon their own countrymen. - Richard Gaisford, BBC reporter in Basra." This is a pattern that makes sense to me: the people hold back from fear until they believe they have a chance to rebel with success, then come out against the Saddam regime. From another report I saw on CNN, apparently our troops in the area are defending them against their own soldiers presently.
3/25/2003 11:24:01 AM |
What spring break? My classes start a week from today -- and looking at the preparation I have to do before then, I realize I have no spring break, or rather that it was the weekend in Eugene. I'm using two new books in my University class, which means a new syllabus, which will take several days to write. I'll try to get some writing done in the mornings as well, focusing first on rewriting the new screenplay.
As much as possible, I'm going to try to leave the war alone here and in my head. I feel like I've said everything I have to say on the matter. I hope support at home remains strong but this surely depends on how it goes. This will be a test of American will and patience.
I appreciate the emails of support some of you have sent me. Unlike when I published my open letter to the peace movement, I haven't received any hate mail. That was a real hoot, getting hate mail from the peace movement!
3/25/2003 07:46:47 AM |
audblog audio post: Today's light verse by Robert Graves. More about Robert Graves here.
3/25/2003 07:00:16 AM |
Monday, March 24, 2003
Modern fiction A highlight of my visit to Eugene was visiting with my brother, who is younger and a poet (more about him here). Bill can't read modern literary fiction -- in fact, he says, if he reads anything written after about 1970, he probably will find it far too "precious and cute" for his taste. "It reads like creative writing," he says, using the reference pejoratively.
He has a point. I've been reading a lot of recent fiction, or trying to, but only get beyond the first chapter (if I even finish that) in about ten percent of what I pick up. Neither of us could stand the "book of the year" last year, The Lovely Bones, though Bill read more into it than I did. I believe Bill has a point about modern fiction, however, because in the sixties there was a dramatic change in the way most fiction writers got trained.
In the 1960s there was a great explosion of MFA programs in this country. Today most writers are trained in graduate writing programs, getting MFAs and going on to teach others to write. I myself am a product of this. Prior to this, however, most writers were trained in the "school of hard knocks," newspaper or magazine writing. The contrast is startling. Journalists write in the real world, meeting deadlines, and interpreting and creating material presented to them. Graduate writing students study what others have read and must create their own stories from their imaginations. What the latter are losing is the incredible experience gained by the former. I think one reason modern fiction is so precious and cute, to use Bill's description, is that form has triumphed over content. Journalists are sent off on assignments where they have incredible experiences from which to draw on later. Students sit in classrooms and read and study the work of others. I think the former training may well develop better storytellers.
3/24/2003 07:00:25 PM |
You can't go home again Eugene remains my favorite town in Oregon. I lived there from 1966-1975, getting my MFA in playwriting from the University of Oregon and then teaching while my wife at the time finished up her Ph.D. Then we moved to Salisbury State College on Maryland's Delmarva peninsula.
My graduate school experience in Eugene was wonderful. Uncharacteristically for graduate students, we were rolling in dough. My wife had a full fellowship for her Ph.D. studies. I was a T.A., then later received a Shubert Playwriting Fellowship. I also was a regular contributor to Northwest magazine and performing weekly as a folksinger (ditto for my wife). One nine-month school year, we saved almost five thousand dollars, and this while keeping most of the graduate students in the English department in beer and spaghetti.
So Eugene is close to my heart. Still, the cliche is true, you can't go home again. Everything is different now. But I have many, many fond memories in Eugene, despite the marriage breaking up (my wife came out of the closet ... see my play, The Half-life Conspiracy).
Saturday night's basketball games were fun. The first was close for a while, the second a slaughter from the start (#1 seed LSU against a small college in Texas). We decided not to stay for tonight's game because they moved the start time back to 8:30pm, so we came on home and can watch it on television, or a more competitive game.
The tournament was dampened by the war, of course. The more thought I give to war, the more I believe that when civilizations advance they put down the seeds of their future destruction -- the abhorrence of war. It's perhaps the greatest irony the gods have created ... as we get too "civilized" for war, we set ourselves up for defeat by the "barbarians" who have not grown too "advanced" for war. I don't see us winning the long-range war, however many battles we win along the way, because I don't think the west has the stomach for the cost it would take to win. I'm not depressed by the war but by the outrage against it. If a war against the most barbaric tyrant since Stalin isn't "a just war" (especially in the context of 9/11), then there's no hope in the long run. What is happening to us, it seems to me, is what happens to all civilized nations throughout the history of the world, and I find it sad and tragic but less surprising the more I think about world history.
So ... the immediate battle with Iraq will be longer and bloodier than we anticipated apparently. I expect we'll prevail. But then lose the peace, which probably already has happened. I still hope the Iraqi people themselves "save us," as only they can, but we betrayed them a decade ago, encouraging them to rebel and then leaving them to Saddam, so I don't blame them for not trusting us again. I have no idea what will happen this time through. I just have this gut feeling the longer war is already over. Very sad.
3/24/2003 05:08:19 PM |
Home, sweet home Back home early, and glad to be. I'll catch up soon.
3/24/2003 02:16:23 PM |
Saturday, March 22, 2003
audblog audio post: Today's light verse by Anonymous.
3/22/2003 07:52:09 AM |
Pessimism As Wordsworth wrote, The world is too much with us ...
Lying in bed, I found myself unable to get the war out of my mind. And although I believe it is going better than expected thus far, I found myself in despair that we probably are winning the battle but losing the war. We have embraced the role of leading the western world in the defense of our very civilization but are coming off as unilateral bullies, splitting the western world even more. I, and according to polls most Americans, accept this role and believe it is necessary but apparently the majority of those we presume to be defending do not welcome our sacrifice. Even if everything in Iraq goes according to plan but we end up with greater divisions among our (former) allies, the terrorists will have made gains. Indeed, if I were a terrorist, I would lay low and let this play itself out because immediate acts of terrorism might only serve to patch up our increasing differences. I suspect emotion more than reason drives a terrorist to behavior, however, and we might yet luck out and find ourselves reuniting against upcoming atrocities. We are perfectly capable of defeating ourselves but this may be too sophisticated and emotionally unsatisfying a strategy for terrorists to embrace.
So what should the U.S. do? Iraq obviously is not the only problem. But if we move from rogue state to rogue state, confronting each as necessary, which is exactly what needs to be done in my view, we will split the west even more because clearly there are huge numbers of people who do not believe terrorists and rogue states have to be confronted head on, or at least not now. In fact, I wish I could believe in this theory but I see absolutely nothing in history that supports it. When tyranny is appeased it does not go away, it grows and sets up a far worse confrontation in the future. Yet it is clear to me that most of the world does not see it this way. In my view, this is tantamount to surrender. And I see nothing gained by the U.S. moving forward alone.
But what can the U.S. do? The only alternative I see is not attractive and goes against the kind of open society we have. It is this: if we cannot lead the world in the defense of civilization as we know it, and if we continue to believe the threat against our civilization is real (as I believe we must until evidence suggests otherwise), then we must defend ourselves and let the rest of the west go its own way. We retreat from our alliances, we withdraw from our international business interests, we terminate immigration and expel non-citizens, we build an Iron Curtain around our borders, and we try to maintain a free, open society here and let the rest of the world go its own way. Let them defend themselves, their way.
Obviously this is not going to happen. We are not going to become independent, closed, an open society within our borders but also like a walled medieval city, keeping the rest of the world out. We are going to participate in the world. Probably as the self-appointed leader, looked at as a bully. And this won't work. If we listen to the majority, and don't confront tyranny head on, this will result in some short-term relative tranquility but I truly believe such a policy only plants the seeds for our future destruction.
So I'm left with this: it's already over. We already lost. We lost the moment the U.N. failed to unite in confronting Saddam head-on. It's over. The question now is only about timing. We have shown we don't have the will to face up to and combat tyranny head on. We've gotten too fat and lazy and "civilized" to defend ourselves. We've lost our sensitivity to evil -- or rather, we play the magic trick of ignoring the true evil in the barbaric acts of a madman and replacing it with an abhorrence for war, calling war "evil," although war always has been the final arbitrator when civilizations clash. Freedom is defended not by rhetoric but by blood. War and evil are natural human parameters but only the former can be used as a tool to rid, at least temporarily, the world of the latter.
We don't have the will to win because we haven't accepted the reality of the confrontation.
I hope my analysis is wrong. I don't think it is; I see no example in history when appeasing tyranny led to long-range good. Maybe this is the first time that will happen. In the meantime, I have a more immediate goal: not to let such a pessimistic outlook get me down. Being 63 helps considerably -- I may not live long enough to see the worst come to pass. I certainly feel blessed in my own life, and I'm damn happy I am not younger than I am. It might have been nice to have been born in a small civilized country like Denmark, but what the hell, you don't choose your native country any more than you choose your parents.
The world is a beautiful place, much of it, and one thing to do is to appreciate it while it's still around. Existential hedonism, let's call it. My opinion about the world and the future matter only to me, in the final analysis -- I'm certainly not going to change anything. I'm a writer, primarily, a storyteller, and my charge is to tell stories that matter to me ... and survival in the face of adversity has always mattered to me. I've had a great ride. I have no right to complain about anything. What happens, happens.
3/22/2003 03:16:46 AM |
Friday, March 21, 2003
Existentialism I came of age intellectually at the tail end of existentialism's fashion in philosophy. Although existentialism has been out of fashion for decades, this approach still influences my thinking, most notably in my belief that individual behavior and responsibility are the final parameters of our character and morality. "No excuses" is the apt title of a series of taped lectures I have on this approach to philosophy. Here are some links:
3/21/2003 09:12:07 PM |
How minds change Thanks, KB, for sharing this UPI story with me. In part, it reads: A group of American anti-war demonstrators who came to Iraq with Japanese human shield volunteers made it across the border today with 14 hours of uncensored video, all shot without Iraqi government minders present. Kenneth Joseph, a young American pastor with the Assyrian Church of the East, told UPI the trip "had shocked me back to reality." Some of the Iraqis he interviewed on camera "told me they would commit suicide if American bombing didn't start. They were willing to see their homes demolished to gain their freedom from Saddam's bloody tyranny. They convinced me that Saddam was a monster the likes of which the world had not seen since Stalin and Hitler. He and his sons are sick sadists. Their tales of slow torture and killing made me ill, such as people put in a huge shredder for plastic products, feet first so they could hear their screams as bodies got chewed up from foot to head." The Iraqis told the young pastor they would commit suicide if the bombing didn't start. They were willing to lose their homes in bombing raids to gain their freedom. And so he changed his outlook.
3/21/2003 05:42:44 PM |
Dorothy Parker Today's light verse is by Dorothy Parker. If you like Parker, don't miss the film Mrs. Parker and the Vicious Circle with its eccentric yet brilliant performance by Jennifer Jason Leigh. I am doing my own tribute to Parket with a dramatic presentation here in Portland in July. Here are some links:
3/21/2003 02:51:07 PM |
audblog audio post: Today's light verse by Dorothy Parker.
3/21/2003 02:39:08 PM |
Letting go ... This blog, like so many, has been obsessed with the war lately ... time to let go and try to approximate normalcy. Leaving town tomorrow will help -- if I write here at all for 3 days, it will be from a cyber cafe in Eugene. In the meantime, I again am encouraged to learn that the commander of the Iraqi army defending the country's second largest city just surrendered. So far, so good.
On other fronts, Oregon just played its worst game of the season and still managed to lose only narrowly to Utah. But boy did they stink! All four other Pac-10 teams made the first round.
I'm printing out my script this afternoon to take with me. I'll get some rewriting time early in the morning while I'm waiting for my wife to wake up.
First, time to decide on my light verse of the day.
3/21/2003 02:35:40 PM |
Shock & Awe The bombing campaign has begun in earnest and on the tube the images are shocking and awesome indeed. It looked like the entire city of Baghdad was being destroyed. An aerial analysis, however, revealed only selected military targets were being hit, but this probably will be ignored by those who will use the horrific images to fuel their reactions of violent protest. Now things will probably be getting worse before they get better for a while, though how the end game plays out remains to be seen.
War is not for the weak of stomach. Nor is the defense of freedom. I quoted John Stuart Mill earlier. He is worth quoting again as food for thought: War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature, and has no chance of being free unless made or kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. Strong stuff. I believe there is at least one exception to this as I've noted before: the existential pacifist, who refuses to fight for personal moral reasons but who also accepts the social/political consequences of his actions and who acts on personal principle, not a desire to change minds or cause disruption: someone with the true integrity and courage of his convictions. I also believe most protesters are well-meaning but do not accept what I believe is true and irrefutable in the history of our species, that our freedoms only exist to the extent that we defend them by force when necessary, and that we are in a world conflict that makes this such a time. I believe in Saddam we encounter a kind of evil we haven't seen since Stalin.
3/21/2003 01:01:08 PM |
How the left is changing? Here's an email from a former left activist like myself, someone who left after 9/11 for similar reasons to mine. This is from Chip Joyce's About the War (and how America is losing) blog. Link to email.
It's hard to say how representative this is. When my Open Letter to the Peace Movement was published all over the Internet after 9/11, I received 100s of letters in response. They were closely divided in half among those calling me an idiotic traitor and those applauding me -- but most of the latter were somewhat gloating welcomes from the right, which in fact I haven't joined, and perhaps only 1/3 of these, or 1/6 of the total, letters that expressed the same difficult intellectual journey and change of mind that I was going through.
The real test of whether the peace movement can change will be this: if this operation in Iraq results in the best case scenario and we are welcomed in the streets of Baghdad as liberators after little loss of life, will the peace movement admit it made a wrong judgment or will it quickly knee-jerk in protest over something else? Is the peace movement itself capable of change and evolution? There certainly are legitimate issues, such as civil liberties for our own citizens, to be worried about. But if the Bush administration proves right on Iraq, what will be the response of the protesters then? If American soldiers come home to great victory parades, as liberators, freeing a populace from a cruel tyrant, will protesters join in the celebration? If not, why not? Of course, such an outcome is by no means certain. In a war of this kind, the goal is considered worth the risk by those who make the decision to wage it.
3/21/2003 08:30:20 AM |
Spring break Well, I should be able to wrap things up today and officially end the winter term. I have some online scripts to read and I'll be done.
Meanwhile, the war is going better early on than anticipated and hopefully the "shock and awe" strategy, which has been delayed, may not even be needed. There is intelligence saying eye witnesses saw Saddam injured after the initial attack, and he appears to be cut off from command. There have been few casualties so far, there have been surrenders and some early Iraqi welcomes, one Iraqi man shouting out in English, "Saddam butcher!" Of course, in a war one never knows what is just ahead. But I have very guarded optimism. I didn't vote for Bush but I would love to see him coming out of this affair smelling like a rose. (I should add that I didn't vote for Gore either -- I'm one of those eccentrics who hates the two-party system).
The NCAA tournament is off and running but with fewer upsets than I rooted for thus far. Today Oregon plays, and I'll definitely watch this one, hoping for Oregon to win so they can face Kentucky, giving me a huge upset to root for. Tomorrow it's to Eugene for the women's tournament! I'll print out the script to take with me and also take the Alphasmart with me.
I feel good this morning. Sure, Portland (which is known as "Little Beirut") had its protesters on the streets for hours and hours last night, many finally getting arrested, and idealists everywhere are protesting our action in Iraq, but I feel strongly we are doing the right thing. As I said before, the support of Iraqis in this country, the smiles on the faces of those I saw interviewed, really raised my spirits.
3/21/2003 05:34:45 AM |
War coverage Here is a war coverage search engine for the latest news.
3/21/2003 05:17:46 AM |
Tony Blair Blair speaks with passion and eloquence in his address to the nation, saying among other things: "Retreat might give us a moment of respite but years of repentance at our weakness would, I believe, follow. It is true that Saddam is not the only threat but it is true also as we British know that the best way to deal with future threats peacefully is to deal with present threats with resolve."
3/21/2003 05:02:37 AM |
Thursday, March 20, 2003
Hopeful signs Hopeful signs after the first full day of war: late intelligence reports say both Saddam and two sons were in the home bombed last night. Intelligence still trying to find out results of the attack. And high ranking Iraqi officers are in communication with us, possibly discussing terms of surrender. Apparently this is why Bush hasn't released a full bombing raid yet. With a little luck ...
3/20/2003 09:09:21 PM |
Iraqis on Iraq This was posted on the The Iraq Foundation website back in February, 2003. It should be required reading for anyone protesting our armed conflict with Saddam.
This is an appeal to all anti-war and peace organizations. We don't want war, but your so-called humanitarian and peace-loving groups have let the Iraqi people down for more than 30 years. Now, you came to demonstrate in our name to avert the only possibility left to remove the nightmare that has descended on our land.
Iraqi people were dying in the hundreds of thousands while you were busy strengthening the Iraqi regime by insisting on so called peaceful solutions and containment. Your solutions have only brought us sanctions, isolation and suffering. Meanwhile, the butcher and his gang were getting bloodier and richer and more influential in the world with the money he is stealing from our people - to pay for the support of many organizations in the west who are now demonstrating against the war that would topple the ugly, fascist regime.
Our families still live in Iraq. They told us that they and the majority of the Iraqi people are waiting for the day of liberation from one of the most vicious and bloody regimes in the history of mankind. This is what the Iraqis want!
The Americans have found out (finally) that their interests are now in helping the people in creating a democratic, peace-loving Iraq, and if there is another country who is willing to help, then we will welcome it with open arms. Oil is our fortune and misfortune. Until now it has been our misfortune, with Saddam Hussein selling the oil fields of the country to France, Russia and others. That's why those countries are opposed to the war - not because they are afraid for the world order and the UN. And if the oil is what is making the Americans interested in helping us, then we are only thankful for this!
I ask you in the name of humanity and peace: why you don't ask the Iraqi people and the Iraqis living among you about what they think before you go out to demonstrate?
On behalf of a group of Iraqis in Switzerland, Germany, Denmark and Canada, I say: your anti-American cause is not our cause!!
FALEH HANI, MISSISSAUGA
3/20/2003 05:33:22 PM |
The home front On the home front today, I was most encouraged by interviews at Iraqi centers here in the U.S. Total support for our action from Iraqis who escaped Saddam, most of whom have family and friends back there. A very telling remark by one of them: "Saddam is not our president, he is your president, you set him up. Now it's time for you to get rid of him so we can go home."
Need to remember the joy on those Iraqi faces when I see all the scowls on the faces of idealists in the streets, angry at our policy of facing a tyrant head on, trying to disrupt business as usual. Where is their anger at the barbarism of Saddam? Where is their professed concern for the people of Iraq who are the real victims of this barbarism?
Well, like I say, the joy in the faces of Iraqis here lifted my spirits.
3/20/2003 05:16:21 PM |
The legacy of war What a sad irony on TV today, switching between the competition of a basketball tournament and the competition of a war, our best and worst natures laid bare. Our worst selves, unfortunately, are as much a part of our nature as our best. We haven't been able to improve this aspect of our nature over centuries of experience. Apparently we never shall.
Here are what others have said about war:
So long as there are men there will be wars. --Albert Einstein
The purpose of all war is ultimately peace. --Saint Augustine
It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace--but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death! --Patrick Henry March 23,1775
Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that. Hate multiplies hate, violence multiplies violence, and toughness multiplies toughness in a descending spiral of destruction....The chain reaction of evil -- hate begetting hate, wars producing more wars -- must be broken, or we shall be plunged into the dark abyss of annihilation. --Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. (1929-1968)
It is fatal to enter any war without the will to win it. --General Douglas MacArthur
In war there is no prize for the runner-up --General Omar Bradley
War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature, and has no chance of being free unless made or kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. --John Stuart Mill
Fighting terrorism is like being a goalkeeper. You can make a hundred brilliant saves but the only shot that people remember is the one that gets past you. --Paul Wilkinson
War will exist until that distant day when the conscientious objector enjoys the same reputation and prestige that the warrior does today. --John F. Kennedy
War is only a cowardly escape from the problems of peace. --Thomas Mann
Everyone's a pacifist between wars. It's like being a vegetarian between meals. --Colman McCarthy
The object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his. --Gen George S. Patton
You can't say civilization don't advance... in every war they kill you in a new way. --Will Rogers
I must study politics and war that my sons may have liberty to study mathematics and philosophy. --John Adams
The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it. --George Orwell
The fear of war is worse than war itself. --Seneca
3/20/2003 12:38:16 PM |
And now for the news in "my world" ... Just turned in my University grades. Still have my online students to catch up with, but then I'll be done for the term -- later today or tomorrow.
The men's basketball tournament has begun! After consultation with the government, NCAA officials decided not to delay it. But CBS, scheduled to telecast it, has given it to ESPN so the network can continue its day-long coverage of the war.
Eager to get back to writing as well. Got some great feedback on the new script, which will inform the next and maybe final rewrite. Then I'll jump right into the novel version.
With a part of my head and heart with the troops, wishing them success and godspeed, life goes on ...
3/20/2003 10:07:07 AM |
Going after Saddam The story of yesterday's unexpected attempt to get Saddam from the get-go -- in today's Washington Post.
3/20/2003 08:21:33 AM |
The loneliness of the University hawk A university is a lonely place for one who supports war with Iraq. Not only is there a strong student movement for peace on many campuses, but many faculty members also belong to the peace movement. Indeed I did before 9/11. So I find myself on the opposite side of the issue from colleagues with whom I once had much in common. They think of me as something just a tad less than an irrational hawk. I think of them as something just a tad less than an historically naive wimp.
The Unitarian church to which I belong has come out strongly against war, so I also feel isolated in my congregation. In fact, when I tried to add a notice in the church bulletin to network with other "hawks" in the congregation (since the minister assured me there were some who agreed with me), my submission was refused! Doves could announce their meetings and marches in the bulletin, but I couldn't try to network with those of a different persuasion! Needless to say, this has changed my relationship to the church in a major way.
I find some solace in the fact that, in the early polls, 2/3 of Americans support our war effort in the new front of Iraq. And my sister-in-law, a lifetime liberal herself, recently emailed me that the peace movement "disgusted" her in its naive view of the Middle East. My wife has been marching for peace, so this introduces some tension in the home, though thus far we have respected our differing views.
All this reminds me how Vietnam tore apart the fabric of the nation, and there is the potential this will happen again. This only reinforces my cynical side, seeing all of this as the beginning of the end of western civilization, which will fall precisely the way civilizations usually fall, because the citizens get too comfortable, too fat, too lazy, and (let's say it) too cowardly and morally bankrupt to defend themselves. You don't need the biggest guns to win a war, Vietnam showed that. You must have the greatest will to win.
Fortunately, in Iraq, there is the great potential that the people will welcome getting rid of Saddam. We may win this battle. But this is a long war, and even if Iraq turns out for the best, will the peace movement learn anything from this? They had better because there will be other fronts in this long war. This is going to last a generation or more. The terrorists are not quitters. The question is whether or not we, the west, are. The U.S. can lead the way to victory in a war here and there, but it will take the unity of the entire western world to win the war. Do we have the unity, the patience, the fortitude, the deep belief in the principles of the Enlightenment to meet the challenge?
Past advances in civilization have planted the very seeds of their own destruction: a belief that war is not necessary. An idealism that man is more rational, evil less a threat, than history ends up proving. Hence the constant attempt to appease tyrants. To delay confrontation with tyrants. So much of the western world, the people themselves, are against confronting Saddam that I wonder if our defeat in the long run is already sealed. Well, I won't live long enough to find out. But I may live long enough to see the west wake up and get its collective act together. I hope so but, as usual, I'm not taking any bets.
3/20/2003 08:09:05 AM |
audblog audio post: Today's light verse by Samuel Hoffenstein.
3/20/2003 07:42:49 AM |
Edmund Burke: "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."
Another example of the rhetorical bankruptcy of the peace movement is its cute slogan, "Support the troops. Bring them home." What condescension! What an insult! What disrespect! This is a volunteer military of men and women who have shown courage and made great sacrifices to serve their country. They deserve our thanks, our respect, and our prayers.
3/20/2003 07:21:08 AM |
Civil Liberties A state of war requires considerably more security efforts than a state of peace, obviously, but history tells us that governments easily go too far in restricting civil liberties in the name of security. The Bush administration already has moved in this direction.
If this concerns you, check out The Bill of Rights Defense Committee, which has local chapters all across the country. See what you can do to protect civil liberties in your community.
3/20/2003 04:07:20 AM |
Language and war As writers, we are guardians of the language. Part of my defection from the peace movement shortly after 9/11 was because of its failure to understand how context determines meaning.
Now that even the peace movement cannot deny that we are in a state of war (which, in fact, we've been in since 9/11), it is important to understand how a nation moves from a state of war to a state of peace: by victory; by defeat; by surrender (defeat without fighting); or by negotiation. As far as I'm concerned, two of these options are unacceptable: surrender and negotiation. You do not negotiate with a barbaric tyrant like Saddam. You do not surrender to a tyrant. Yet these are precisely the two options suggested by the peace movement in its steadfast refusal to present alternative strategies in the war against terrorism. They act as if "peace" is simply a matter of quitting, of withdrawal, which in fact is tantamount to surrender. One might excuse this attitude as being a result of stupidity, its refusal to accept that we were in a state of war, but now that the front has been widened to Iraq, even peaceniks must understand the nature of our reality.
So do they still want surrender? Negotiation? How do they propose to move from a state of war to a state of peace?
People of good will, it seems to me, will pray for victory as quickly and with as little loss to life as possible. There also are those among us who would like to see our defeat. In a state of war, this is called treason.
The point is this: when you say "peace," what do you mean? Do you mean victory or defeat or surrender or negotiation?
3/20/2003 03:50:51 AM |
Wednesday, March 19, 2003
The natural face of evil Check out this short poem.
3/19/2003 01:21:50 PM |
Word Chowder II Scott Emmons' wonderful online book of light verse, Word Chowder, has been redesigned and updated with new verse. Don't miss:
Scott Emmons is a first-rate comic versifier.
3/19/2003 08:48:17 AM |
audblog audio post: Today's light verse by Richard Armour.
3/19/2003 06:18:07 AM |
Saddam's crimes against humanity From a woman member of the British House of Commons during the recent debate:
“There was a machine designed for shredding plastic. Men were dropped into it and we were again made to watch. Sometimes they went in head first and died quickly. Sometimes they went in feet first and died screaming. It was horrible. I saw 30 people die like this. Their remains would be placed in plastic bags and we were told they would be used as fish food . . . on one occasion, I saw Qusay [President Saddam Hussein’s youngest son] personally supervise these murders.”
This is one of the many witness statements that were taken by researchers from Indict — the organisation I chair — to provide evidence for legal cases against specific Iraqi individuals for war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide. This account was taken in the past two weeks.
Another witness told us about practices of the security services towards women: “Women were suspended by their hair as their families watched; men were forced to watch as their wives were raped . . . women were suspended by their legs while they were menstruating until their periods were over, a procedure designed to cause humiliation.”
The accounts Indict has heard over the past six years are disgusting and horrifying. Our task is not merely passively to record what we are told but to challenge it as well, so that the evidence we produce is of the highest quality. All witnesses swear that their statements are true and sign them.
For these humanitarian reasons alone, it is essential to liberate the people of Iraq from the regime of Saddam. The 17 UN resolutions passed since 1991 on Iraq include Resolution 688, which calls for an end to repression of Iraqi civilians. It has been ignored. Torture, execution and ethnic-cleansing are everyday life in Saddam’s Iraq. (Read her entire remarks.)
Question: why isn't the peace movement, which is so outraged by our foreign policy that it acts upon this outrage, outraged enough by Saddam's behavior to act upon this outrage as well? Or is it not bothered enough by these atrocities? Or does it consider our foreign policy a greater atrocity? Sorry, my former colleagues in the peace movement, I just don't get it.
See my Open Letter to the Peace Movement, written just after 9/11/01.
3/19/2003 06:10:30 AM |
Finals! Turned back the student projects last night and picked up their finals. I gave a challenging final exam. I passed out three very short stories (under 2000 words) that I'd written over the years. Their task was to choose one and adapt it as a short film, writing the screenplay for same. This is harder than writing an original story. It will be fun to read what they came up with.
I hope to get through them all today. Tomorrow ... back to my own work ... and the beginning of the men's basketball tournament!
I have a one-year, year-to-year, contract with the University for my screenwriting course. Oregon has one of the worse budget crises in the country, and last summer I didn't get my contract for this year until about six weeks after I usually get it, so I was wondering if I'd be rehired or not. I suspect this anxiety will be commonplace every summer now. But as a good first step, I am on the list of pre-fall course listings for next school year. They changed my time frame, however. Instead of two hours on Tuesday and Thursday evenings, they have me for four hours on Monday evening. A four-hour class! Nothing like overkill. Well, I do show a lot of movies in class, so that will take half the class when I do it.
I have a long day. Better get cracking. It's 5:30a.m. already! Obviously I'm a morning person.
3/19/2003 05:33:21 AM |
Heroes On January 20, 1961, John F. Kennedy gave his inaugural address. Among the things he said was:
"In the long history of the world, only a few generations have been granted the role of defending freedom in its hour of maximum danger. I do not shrink from this responsibility--I welcome it. I do not believe that any of us would exchange places with any other people or any other generation. The energy, the faith, the devotion which we bring to this endeavor will light our country and all who serve it--and the glow from that fire can truly light the world.
And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you--ask what you can do for your country." (Read or listen to the entire speech.)
On NPR this morning, there were many interviews with Americans in uniform who stand on the brink of war. Many are not professional soldiers but reservists, "weekend warriors" now called into action (I believe I heard the figure that 40% on active duty now are reservists), who gave up higher paying careers to heed the call of their Commander-in-Chief. I can think of no other Americans who so devotedly have responded to Kennedy's challenge with sacrifice and courage. All of them are heroes in my book, and I think they should be considered heroes by every American, no matter what his or her politics. These people are willing to put their lives on the line to rid the world of a vicious tyrant, a man who just a day ago made a public display of a dissident by cutting out his tongue and letting him bleed to death.
But there is another kind of person I also consider a hero: the existential pacifist. A person who refuses to fight a war, any war, on morale grounds -- and is willing to pay the sacrifice for his or her beliefs. I say "existential" pacifist to distinguish between activists who would disrupt activity in protest of war, in an attempt to get press and attention for their cause. I believe context determines the moral worth of these actions. But an existential pacifist, who says simply like Melville's Bartleby, "I prefer not to," who does not try to change anyone else's mind but acts individually from a profound sense of personal moral outrage -- these rare folks are heroes in my book as well because they have both the courage of their convictions and the integrity to embrace the consequences.
We have many more of the former kind of heroes than the latter. I hope history plays out so their brave efforts gain appreciation. In fact, interestingly enough, now that war is inevitable, some critics are covering their bets. Even France has said it will join the coalition of the willing if Iraq uses chemical weapons. I guess I'm just a stubborn Scorpio. I'd tell France, thanks but no thanks, we don't need you. But it's better foreign policy to grin and let them join.
So, like so many people, I wait with bated breath, a heavy weight in my gut, hoping for the best but secure in my belief that we are doing the right thing and, so far, doing it the best way among unfortunate alternatives. I never remember a Presidential speech in which the distinction between a regime (the enemy) and its people (not the enemy) was made so clearly, when the invitation to surrender was emphasized so strongly. I have no idea if this message actually will get to the people who need to hear it. I hope so.
The clock ticks ...
3/19/2003 05:12:59 AM |
Tuesday, March 18, 2003
Best & worst scenarios Best: we invade, lots of defections and Iraqi troops refusing to fight, many welcome us as liberators, we get Saddam once and for all, we manage to help create a workable federation among all the conflicting tribal interests, or some significant combination of these successes.
Worst: Saddam uses all his weaponry (chemicals, nerve gas, etc.), he takes his wrath out on the Kurds and other factions against him again, he burns oil fields, he manages to convince the world we have committed greater atrocities than whatever accidents happen, there is more resistance than we anticipate and the war drags on, there is increased violence at home and in the world against our being there ... and it drags on and on ...
I have no idea how it will turn out. I hope for the best. I'm not sure anything will surprise me.
3/18/2003 02:26:03 PM |
Be informed! PBS' Frontline has put up a website The Long Road to War, with resources from a variety of viewpoints. Especially see the Readings and Links area.
Also see my earlier post, Iraq resources.
An extreme faction of the Left, according to an interview I saw on CNN, is preparing the disrupt the war effort with aggressive action in any way it can. This is not Vietnam, this is not the U.S. choosing sides in a civil war. This is a war to get rid of a tyrant who trains terrorists (according to interviews with defectors) and hides weapons of mass destruction and gives monetary rewards to families of suicide bombers, all of which link Saddam Hussein's regime to the network of those who consider the West (and the U.S. especially) infidels. This is waging a war that was declared against us on 9/11. If the Left doesn't like the strategy of invading Iraq, they must be clear that their opposition isn't read as being against the broader war -- because if they are against the war on terrorism itself, a war declared on 9/11, then what are they saying? That we should surrender? Or are they so naive as to believe the war will go away if we simply don't participate in it? They must communicate clearly and carefully what they are against and what they are for. What is the Left, the peace movement, for? How would they combat terrorism? If they have creative and workable answers to these questions, we need to hear them. If they are knee-jerking for peace without an alternative strategy, well, they are naive and self-indulgent.
3/18/2003 01:11:04 PM |
Viktor Frankl I received a private email inquiring about the book I mentioned below, Man's Search for Meaning. It was written by Viktor Frankl. Here are some links:
3/18/2003 08:48:53 AM |
A City on a Hill When the Pilgrims settled the "New World," their vision of community was as "a city on a hill" -- and there is something strikingly self-reliant and independent and safe about this image, existing above the rest of the world below, elevated, isolated, safe from harm. What would "a city on a hill" look like today, in today's world? To me it suggests a kind of neo-isolationism. Imagine this:
If our allies do not believe the world is as dangerous as we do now (or at least as the Bush administration does), if they are not willing to join us in war to protect our freedoms and principles, fine -- then let's terminate all our foreign alliances. Let's pack up our troops and bring them home. Let NATO fend for itself. Let South Korea fend for itself.
Let's focus on taking care of ourselves. A crash program of self-reliance, from foreign oil, from foreign interests. Put technology in high gear to establish alternative clean energy sources. Ban immigration. Take care of our own, period, and if you're not lucky enough to be born here, too bad. When the troops come home, put them to work in a real war against drugs, against organized crime. Put reservists to work rebuilding our infrastructure, repairing bridges, highways. Tighten border security around the entire U.S. border.
Concentrate on making life here better and to hell with the rest of the world: establish free health care, free college education, for every citizen. Establish a guaranteed minimum income for everyone -- and help pay for it by establishing a maximum income as well. Who the hell needs more than [pick your figure: $10 million a year?] anyway? Create a utopia right here. Build Star Wars to protect any attack from beyond our borders. Take care of our own and to hell with everyone else. America for Americans. A city on a hill.
Somebody write a science-fiction novel about the consequences of this. Or has it already been written? I'd like to know what happens.
3/18/2003 05:03:34 AM |
Robert Graves Today's light verse is by Robert Graves. Links:
3/18/2003 04:48:22 AM |
audblog audio post: Today's light verse by Robert Graves.
3/18/2003 04:42:05 AM |
Monday, March 17, 2003
The case for colonialism From England's The Spectator comes an argument by Daniel Kruger I haven't seen in the U.S. press, at least not put so clearly, that what Thomas Jefferson called an "empire of liberty" is a worthy goal for the use of power. Go there now. There obviously will be heated arguments on the other side of this question. In fact, I already can feel the temperature rising -- and not about basketball. Thank the gods for small escapes like throwing a round ball through a hoop!
3/17/2003 09:38:44 PM |
Finals week Managed to get a large majority of student scripts read and graded; only a handful to finish up tomorrow morning. So I can go into finals week with a clean slate, pick up all their take-home finals tomorrow, and begin with a new stack of reading on Wednesday. I should be able to get my grades in on Thursday, just in time to begin watching the men's tourney on the tube. Presumably the war won't be on ESPN -- program directors aren't known for their sense of irony.
3/17/2003 09:13:45 PM |
The 7 year old kid down the block ... A dozen years ago, there was a seven year old kid watching the news on TV, the Gulf war over, but Saddam Hussein still in power, and little did he or she know that today, at 19, s/he would be on the front lines, being asked to take care of business because a dozen years ago the adults didn't take care of business when they had the chance. And today there is another 7 year old boy or girl, watching Bush talk about war, and not really comprehending what it all means, and I hope we take care of business this time, so that 7 year old won't be asked, a dozen years from now, to go get rid of Saddam Hussein ...
3/17/2003 07:20:03 PM |
Peace ...is a matter of perspective. The inner life v. the external environment. Letting go of things you have no power or control over. A philosopher in a Nazis extermination camp learned that the one important thing the Nazis had no control over was his attitude. He wrote about this in a book called Man's Search for Meaning. The birds in the yard are quite lovely today.
3/17/2003 02:58:27 PM |
War This must be on everyone's mind. I'm not against war with Iraq, which puts me in the minority in arts communities, at least around here, but I'm not happy with the Bush war strategy of "shock and awe." I would rather see an emphasis on ground troops, combing the entire country for Hussein's hidden weaponry -- and I mean the entire country. At the same time, I would like us to make it clear we are after him and his weapons, not the Iraqi people, and so offer political asylum to anyone who wants to turn against the regime. I would like the air war to be held in reserve as backup, rather than as an over-powering first kill. In other words, rather than "shock and awe" -- going after surrender from fear -- I would like to see us invite surrender and rebellion against the regime by the Iraqi people themselves, with a longer more focused ground war, the goal being to find and destroy his weaponry. This is a higher risk policy in terms of American lives in the short run but I think it has political advantages in the long run.
But this isn't what is going to be done, so talking about it is an exercise in wishful thinking. I've never approved of letting Saddam Hussein endlessly drag his feet and make fools of the U.N., and the righteousness of France is laughable, considering all their economic ties to the Iraqi regime. Politics is dirty any way you cut it, and nations are selfish by nature. At the same time, this war likely will be a disaster (but a smaller disaster now, perhaps, than the later disaster if we sat around while more rogue nations got nuclear arms).
Here is my cynical take on things: civilizations fall when they become too fat and lazy to defend themselves against the "barbarians" knocking at the door. This is what happens. World history tells us that. So maybe the west has now become too fat and lazy to defend itself.
Maybe the lack of consensus at the U.N. is the first note of this tragic opera, The Fall of the West. What John Leonard called "the Kamikazes of Kingdom Come" seem to believe in their cause of Muslim extremism more than the West believes in our principles of the Enlightenment. They commit suicide for their cause, getting to Heaven for their night with a dozen virgins, while we can't even round up an international army, instead bickering and hemming-and-hawing and doing anything to avoid war, which is the arena where these conflicts get resolved in the real world. Or at least that has been the history of the species. I don't see anyone making a convincing argument that human nature has changed recently.
Maybe if 250,000 civilians stand in front of approaching armies the way that young woman in Palestine did, willing to put their lives on the line, to die for a cause ... but on second thought, that number probably falls way short. War has a very long tradition. It might take millions of "human shields" to appease the gods of war -- and voluntary ones, not those ordered into service by Saddam Hussein.
Given the reality of the situation, I hope Bush is completely right. I hope it's a quick, clean war, and the Iraqi people shower us with candy kisses as liberators. But I'm not taking any bets. There's that overture I hear, an opera, Wagnerian in its tragic notes, The Fall of the West, history once again repeating itself ad infinitum ... no wonder Joyce called history a nightmare.
It's times like this, frankly, when I am glad I am too old to hang around for the final act. And on this happy note, back to grading student scripts!
And I'm going to enjoy the hell out of March Madness on the basketball court, to hell with madness in the world.
3/17/2003 11:31:05 AM |
Animated history Here is a site worth looking at for its use of technology, whatever you think of its politics. It's a flash animation about Israel's 1981 bombing of a nuclear reactor being built for Saddam Hussein by the French (led by, you guessed it, Jacques Chirac). World politics makes strange bedfellows (and not only when we make the mistake). Animation: the bombing of Tamuz.
There are many uses for this kind of "slide show" presentation. I have an online "cyber performance" of a poem using the same strategy: Advice to an Artist on Choosing a Wife: the Cyber Performance.
3/17/2003 06:54:12 AM |
Bertolt Brecht Today's light verse is by Bertolt Brecht. Shortly before he died, my friend Ger read a book about Brecht in which the claim was made that most of his plays were largely co-authored with one of several women, whichever was in his life at the time. If true, an interesting historical drama there. Here are some links:
3/17/2003 06:35:35 AM |
audblog audio post: Today's light verse by Bertolt Brecht.
3/17/2003 06:26:29 AM |
Sunday, March 16, 2003
Taking a breather ... Been reading student scripts all day. Time for a break.
NCAA brackets set for the tournaments. In Eugene at the women's tourney, we get to see the #1 seed in the West, LSU, and get to root for a regional team, the Univ. of Washington. In the men's tourney, Oregon has a tough road. If it can get by Utah in Nashville, it squares off against (unless there is a huge upset) Kentucky, the number one team in the country right now. As for me, I'm rooting for Harvard! The closer they score to their average IQ, the better.
3/16/2003 06:29:33 PM |
W.H. Auden Today's light verse is by W.H. Auden, whom I had the good fortune to meet before he died. Links:
3/16/2003 07:20:40 AM |
audblog audio post: Today's light verse by W.H. Auden.
3/16/2003 07:13:50 AM |
Saturday, March 15, 2003
Goodnight, Charles All in all, a busy, informative and productive day! Tomorrow the students take center stage and remain there for the next four or five days, till I get my grades turned in. Tomorrow afternoon, the men's and women's NCAA tournament teams are announced. Oregon is in the men's tourny. Eager to see which women's teams I'll see in Eugene next weekend.
3/15/2003 10:08:28 PM |
Remember the Sixties? From Arion: a journal of Humanities and the Classics comes Camille Paglia's long essay Cults and Cosmic Consciousness: Religious Vision in the American 1960s.
Here's one of my sixties stories. In my senior year at UCLA I was in the English Honors program, which meant I had the opportunity to take seminars with 10 or fewer students in them. One was in Modern American Poetry. On the first day of class, I entered the seminar room to find the professor on the table in a lotus position. He was wearing a white robe. His eyes were closed. Other students entered, and we all sat down, watching the silent professor in his meditation or whatever it was. Finally someone spoke up, then others, but no one got a response. Finally we all left, figuring the lesson would be explained at our next meeting. However, in two days we entered the seminar room to find a different professor, who said he was taking over the class because our original teacher "has decided to meditate all term." This was the sixties.
Another story. As a graduate student and Teaching Assistant at the University of Oregon, I was active against the Vietnam War. So were many of my students. However, they were not very good at understanding who their friends on the faculty were because one night they burned down the cheap building where my office was located (as well as the offices of many junior faculty, from which most of their support came). You don't burn down the offices of your allies! Dumb kids.
3/15/2003 06:18:06 PM |
Muslims and Hollywood Initial response from agents is that any screenplay with a major Muslim character (who isn't a terrorist) is unmarketable. I already knew Hollywood often exaggerated the worst in us ... and I should have foreseen this but didn't. But now that I think about it, it makes perfect "Hollywood sense" unfortunately. I apparently was right about the unmarketability of the screenplay but for the wrong reasons. We'll see if any contrary opinions trickle in. All the more reason to head quickly to the novel. Onward.
3/15/2003 11:25:18 AM |
Oil, oil, everywhere I've seen the "No blood for oil!" signs. Today I saw on TV a sign (at last) to tell the other half of the equation: "No appeasement for oil!" After all, wouldn't a regime change in Iraq negate those lucrative oil contracts held by France and Russia? They have very much more oil interests there than we do. So let's tell both sides of the story, please.
3/15/2003 09:36:45 AM |
Marketing musings Been thinking about what to do with Love in the Ruins now that I think the screenplay version is close. I like this story a lot, and I think it would make a good movie but I also know Hollywood enough to presume they would change the ending from dark to light, which I don't want to happen, at least not at this point. Clearly the thing I have to do first is write the novel version so my original conception of the story will be established. Then I can decide if I want to do more. At the same time, I'm curious if my take on the story's backdrop (the story could be described as Romeo & Juliet meets 9/11) being marketable to Hollywood is off base, so I've written a "pitch" to a couple agents I know, just to see what the response is (enthusiasm or no enthusiasm -- these things are very easily determined). If the agents are cold, then LaLaLand is a moot issue anyway. Maybe just as well.
At any rate, the novel is next on the agenda. I don't want to make it too expansive from the vision in the screenplay, so I'm looking at a short novel, maybe 60,000 to 70,000 words, pretty much adhering to the story strategy I've already established. If I use the screenplay's protagonist as a viewpoint character, rather than writing omnisciently, I'll also have to do less research (! lazy me) because there are things he naturally would not know. I could pose questions from curiosity, rather than stating facts. So I don't necessarily have to know the answers. Not sure if that's the way to go but am thinking about it. There's still some research I have to do about locales and other things.
This is going to be much fun to write because the screenplay will be a kind of security blanket. I've never done this before, written a screenplay as a draft to a novel. A former student does it all the time, did it the first time in my class, and gave me the idea. She swears by it. I can see its advantages.
So, anyway, that seems to be the plan. Onward.
3/15/2003 09:09:17 AM |
Oliver Wendell Holmes Today's light verse is by Oliver Wendell Holmes (not to be confused with Jr., the jurist). And he wrote this long before the Internet!
Two links of resources:
3/15/2003 06:42:36 AM |
audblog audio post: Today's light verse by Oliver Wendell Holmes.
3/15/2003 06:39:20 AM |
Friday, March 14, 2003
On second thought ... Naturally I am beginning to see more to fix in the script than I thought at first ... but mostly it is character stuff, and cranking stuff up, rather than redesigning the strategy of the story, all of which is pretty easy to fix in a screenplay, though they will be more complicated to address in the novel. It is still an exceptionally clean draft, at least for me.
Felt great to get a full day of (re)writing in, especially with that tall stack of student scripts waiting for me. I got enough done today to get me through the long weekend of reading (and, when I'm not reading, watching basketball).
Got a phone call this morning from the oldest son of my best body, who died a few years ago. I've graduated from being an unofficial uncle (I've known the two boys since they were toddlers, and the oldest is now in his 40s) to a kind of surrogate dad. We made a bet on the UCLA-Oregon game, as we always do (he got his BA at Oregon), and I took UCLA (our traditional bet). Since he owes me five bucks from an earlier bet, it was double or nothing. Brad's doing great, keeping his father's small mortgage business alive, raising a great family, expressing his considerable blues harmonica talents in a band. His brother, unfortunately, is not doing too well and is back in jail on a parole violation -- drug problem. Dick felt a lot of guilt about the younger son, what did he do wrong etc, and he died before any of this came close to being resolved. I don't know if the younger son will ever get it together.
I make a trip to northern Idaho every summer, to visit the older son in Moscow and to visit Dick's mom in Orofino, who is very much alive and kicking. This summer won't be an exception ... we'll likely make a short camping trip of it.
3/14/2003 03:12:48 PM |
A good draft Love in the Ruins may be the cleanest screenplay draft I've ever written. It's in damn good shape, with only minor things to fix along the way, and an ending to crank up a tad. I suppose it's so clean because the story came to me complete (and because it's such a generic story). The novel, however, will take much more work since it must include details, which I have to research, that I can skip in the screenplay. So I'll start my reading for that soon. First, though, I am rewriting the screenplay as a screenplay even though I believe it would be very hard to market, especially with its dark (tragic) ending.
But I'm delighted it's in such good shape. My first drafts usually are quite a mess, so I was surprised by how little I want to change. I'll finish inputting the changes into the computer today, then print out another copy to let someone with fresh eyes look at, likely my wife. Onward.
3/14/2003 12:27:34 PM |
G.K. Chesterton Today's light verse is by G.K. Chesterton, who today has a magazine devoted to his ideas. My late friend Ger was forever after me to do a one-man show on Chesterton because he thought we were dead-ringers. Here are some links:
3/14/2003 05:57:59 AM |
audblog audio post: Today's light verse by G.K. Chesterton.
3/14/2003 05:53:51 AM |
Thursday, March 13, 2003
Tourny time! There are conference basketball tournaments going on all across the country, and today "my" tourny, the Pac-10, started with two games that went down to the last seconds, both endings of which I got to witness. UCLA upset Arizona in overtime while I got 30-second updates from Yahoo! during my office hours. Since this game went longer than intended, the Oregon-Ariz State game got a late start, which gave me the chance to hear the last 3 minutes on the radio after my class, Oregon pulling it out. So tomorrow my two alma maters, UCLA and Oregon, face off ... and I usually go for the underdog in these matchups, so I'm pulling for 8-seeded UCLA.
Sunday the invitations to the Big Dance go out. I love this time of year.
3/13/2003 07:12:30 PM |
Published / Unpublished I've received several emails from unpublished writers expressing thanks but also surprise that I've added their blogs to my list of writing blogs. That a published writer would take an unpublished writer seriously! Well, for starters, I also am a writing teacher, used to the struggles of unpublished writers. And, of course, all writers begin being unpublished and it's never wise to forget where one came from. But there is something else at work here -- the magic of publication.
I am convinced that writers want, above all else, not fame nor fortune, not prizes nor press, though all of these are nice, or at least seem to be when one doesn't have them -- above all else, writers want to exist. To exist as a writer means to exist in a mode where readers can find your work. Traditionally this has meant being published in print and hopefully being stored in a library for posterity. Certainly that's what I've wanted (and it has paid off: see the amazing story about a 35-year-old article of mine inspiring a recent book in the non-fiction area of my archives).
The Internet may be changing, or at least tweaking, this equation. Print-on-demand as well. Writers are more than ever in charge of their publication destinies, and there are obvious advantages and disadvantages to this in terms of the literary health of the culture. The main disadvantage is that more bad writing than ever will see print. When editors and others making literary judgments are bypassed, this is an inevitable result. Some "writers" always will be blind to their lack of talent and ability.
At the same time, the market has become so skewed toward commercial, popular writing that doubtless a good amount of quality literature has been bypassed by the traditional publishing industry. The new technology should bring some or even much of this writing back into print, giving it a possibility to find its necessarily limited audience, and this is a very good thing. In fact, this is the area of the marketplace that intrigues me more and more.
The publishing industry is in great transition. What is needed, for writers, is the emergence to a larger readership of writing that began online or with print-on-demand, so these new options will gain respect and not be dismissed as "vanity publishing," which remains a pejorative term even though musicians and artists do something similar without being labeled derogatively for it. Somebody needs to publish a masterpiece on the Internet, perhaps is what I am saying. Something everyone agrees is outstanding, something perhaps rejected by everyone associated with traditional publishing -- except by readers, who found it here, on the net.
I'm waiting.
3/13/2003 01:04:05 PM |
Red ink The part of the writing process I like the most is rewriting -- not on the computer but rewriting a printout with my red pen. I love making red chicken scratches across all the pages. I usually rewrite both ways, by computer and by pen, but the latter gives me the most pleasure for some reason. Probably because I began my career long before there were computers.
Got through the first fifty pages of the script this morning, and I love it thus far. A definite keeper. Unless there are major problems in the last half I'm not aware of yet. At any rate, going to input my changes into the computer before it's time to go to the Univ. Onward.
3/13/2003 11:24:20 AM |
Big day! Not only the official last day of the regular term, when I collect their term scripts, but the first full morning I've had for a while with time to do a bit of my own work -- this, before the major reading crunch with term projects and finals (collected next Tuesday). So the plan is to read through the draft of LOVE IN THE RUINS and see where the hell I am with it. And if I have time to do more, read through HAIL, MARY!, drafted by my screenwriting partner and still needing an ending. So a pleasant morning of reading my stuff, a nice change of rhythm in crunch time. Actually I normally don't have this break of sunlight in this very busy last few weeks of a term. And, to change the subject, Oregon plays in the Pac-10 tournament late this afternoon with a must-win game if it wants a ticket to the Big Dance -- but, alas, I'll be in class and miss all but the very end of the game. A big day on many fronts! Let it begin in earnest -- with breakfast.
3/13/2003 09:00:59 AM |
audblog audio post: Today's light verse by Theodore Roethke.
3/13/2003 08:31:22 AM |
Theodore Roethke Today's light verse is by Theodore Roethke. Roethke is something of a legend here in the Northwest, having taught at the University of Washington. He mentored such Northwest poets as Richard Hugo, who went on to teach at, and increase the reputation of, the University of Montana. Here are some links:
3/13/2003 08:26:37 AM |
Wednesday, March 12, 2003
Breathing room again At this point in time, I am caught up in my student reading again! Tomorrow at this time, I pick up over 600 pages of student scripts, the term projects. But today is today ... breathing room!
Interesting Talk of the Nation show on NPR today. First topic, military families in time of stress, a topic dear to my heart as a Navy brat myself. Especially during unpopular wars, as the upcoming one appears to be. I also am more than usual interested in the military since this will be the first war with American women playing such a large role in combat, curious about how that is going to come down. Personally I am for a universal draft for both men and women. But that's another issue.
The second topic was scandal in March Madness, all the firings and cheatings going on in men's NCAA basketball. One of the reasons I've come to prefer the women's college game and high school sports! Where sports is still more sports than business.
Here's a quick cure: get rid of all the athletic scholarships. Period. That will make college sports sports again, rather than a free recruitment program for professional sports. Or tell it like it is and make pro teams pay for the farm system! Or, a compromise suggested by a Univ. president somewhere, make student-athletes much more accountable for the student half of the equation, up the scholastic demands and really enforce them. But why not just get rid of student scholarships? Let the pro teams in basketball and football form their own farm system. Let college jocks be just that.
By the way, not getting much writing done this week. But that's to be expected. Thinking about my projects a lot!
3/12/2003 04:50:42 PM |
Ambrose Bierce Today's light verse is by Ambrose Bierce. If you are not familiar with Bierce, do not miss The Devil's Dictionary. Links:
3/12/2003 10:34:03 AM |
audblog audio post: Today's light verse by Ambrose Bierce.
3/12/2003 10:22:54 AM |
The Writer's Almanac The Garrison Keillor radio show also can be accessed online, to read or listen to: The Writer's Almanac Online.
3/12/2003 10:18:28 AM |
Antiwar protesters trash 9/11 memorial This is the kind of publicity the peace movement does not need -- but unfortunately it is not atypical of peace movements in general, which by nature include fringe groups more radical than the general population of protesters, including those advocating the overthrow of the U.S. government. This was true during the era of Vietnam protests, when I was an activist, and today, when I am not. The peace movement has never been able to police its own people satisfactorily. And the media, of course, jumps on a story like this. And some pro-war folks jump to conclusions by suggesting this represents the entire peace movement, which is unfortunate. Most are honest, well-meaning folks who think of themselves as patriotic. Today I am not among them because I consider the movement hugely naive, not because I doubt their sincerity. But they need to do something about fringe actions like this. Here is the story from the Whittier Daily News. What peace activists in Whittier should do is volunteer to rebuild the memorial!
3/12/2003 08:09:41 AM |
Twin Peaks The pilot of Twin Peaks, which my wife and I saw last night, was unusual in that it was an overview of the entire series rather than an opening "hook" episode or two. This was great for Harriet, who never had seen it before, and a great refresher for me. Still as camp and fun as ever. I ran into a former screenwriting student who knew everything there was to know about the series, it appears. And fans are still active on the net. Here are some links.
Yahoo! lists 160,000 websites when you do a "Twin Peaks" search.
3/12/2003 08:02:14 AM |
Tuesday, March 11, 2003
The Golden Age of Science Fiction A woman across the aisle on the bus today was reading a novel by Robert Heinlein. Half a century ago, I could have been doing the same thing. I was a big scifi fan in high school but didn't read much after that. My favorite authors, besides Heinlein, were Robert Sheckley, Isaac Asimov, Frederic Brown and Theodore Sturgeon.
Sheckley lives here in Portland now. I first met him at a party over a decade ago and was amused to find him with a young wife with purple hair. Ah, Robert, I thought. A few months ago he sent me an email, suggesting coffee, and we met and spent a few hours together. I was shocked to learn that he was hurting financially -- he's a giant of the golden age of scifi! He was seeking advice on finding an inexpensive room to rent. He was seeking advice on how to use the Internet to sell books. He is still publishing but not easily and with small presses, it seems. He is not the literary scifi giant he was in the 1950s. He's writing better than ever, he says, and probably is, but fashions come and go. We so easily forget the giants among us.
Here are some links.
3/11/2003 03:00:44 PM |
Breathing room Have the essential stuff done before my Univ. class ... taking a breather.
It's been a while since I've read Voltaire's Candide, another classic that lends itself to reading in trying times. Not much difference between tending one's garden (Voltaire's ending) and mowing the lawn, ha ha! "It's the best of all possible worlds," right.
Still planning to catch the Twin Peaks pilot tonight, ought to be fun, though it starts late, about my usual bedtime. But it's also a rare chance to see it on a big screen. The one-armed actor in that series, whose name momentarily escapes me, was at the University of Oregon when I was a grad student there, and he often was in Univ productions. He played the father in Pinter's The Homecoming and defined the role as far as I'm concerned. I've seen several productions since but none of the fathers is in his company. He also was one of the local drug dealers, the mentioning of which I hope is beyond the statute of limitations. He escaped getting caught and doing time, however, as a fellow actor dealer in the theater department did not. Ah, the sixties!
The Golden Arches are going cyber, offering Internet access. They'll be net kiosks soon. Maybe there already are. When I retire, I have this idea of teaching online while I'm driving a van around the country, camping out, going online every few days to teach and read papers, then getting back on the road, the itinerant online teacher.
Here's a good online teaching story. A friend teaches English Comp. online for a community college. During the Christmas holidays she was in Paris and hated to come back. She sent me an email (I'd mentored her a bit in going online) asking if I thought she'd get "caught" if she taught her online class not from the Oregon coast but from Paris, France! I said, go for it. She did and everything worked out fine. She taught her class from Paris, and it made no difference whatever. There's telecommuting on a grand scale.
3/11/2003 12:50:35 PM |
Up and at 'em! Quite a few script pages to read before class today, so it will be a horse race to get them done. I begin with a full length draft, quite a good script, then a couple of complete shorts, then some partial features. If I stick to it all morning, I should be fine. In class at the University today, they make their class presentations -- a modified pitch session of their scripts -- so all I have to do is sit back and watch. Class will be a breeze, it's before class when I have much reading to do.
Sometime this week I hope to get out to see a late night movie that's showing, the pilot for Twin Peaks. Loved that strange series when it was on the tube. Maybe I can get away tonight.
Well, I'd better hit the scripts.
3/11/2003 07:24:07 AM |
audblog audio post: Today's light verse by Anonymous.
3/11/2003 07:08:02 AM |
Monday, March 10, 2003
Lewis & Clark New online: The Journals of the Lewis and Clark Expedition.
"The Journals of the Lewis and Clark Expedition Online makes available the text of the celebrated Nebraska edition of the Lewis and Clark journals, edited by Gary E. Moulton. Moulton's edition—the most accurate and inclusive edition ever published—is one of the major scholarly achievements of the late twentieth century. Initially offering almost two hundred pages from volume four, this website will eventually feature the full text of the journals—almost five thousand pages. Also included are a gallery of images as well as audio files of acclaimed poet William Kloefkorn reading selected passages. With a focus on full-text searchability and ease of navigation, the Journals of the Lewis and Clark Expedition Online is intended to be both a useful tool for scholars and an engaging website for the general public."
Looks like a terrific resource. There is no indication how long it will take for the website to become fully functional.
3/10/2003 06:14:55 PM |
Letter to a Dead Buddy Hey, Dick! Miss you, man. You've been gone for several years now but I still can't believe you won't be coming to town soon so we can share one of our marathon breakfasts. You know, through four decades of being best friends, we only lived in the same place at the same time when we met in the Army in Germany in 1960. Yet hardly a week went by in all those years without us touching bases on the phone (mostly) or in letters or in visits. Near the end, when you had your office in Lewiston and came to Portland often on business, I looked forward to these trips so we could have an early morning breakfast and stretch it into mid-morning as we got caught up on things happening to us individually and mutually as citizens, as humans. We never solved the world's problems but we sure got a lot of laughs from them, and I miss the politically incorrect, dark and absurdist sense of humor we shared. There hasn't been much shared laughter about the planet since you departed. But man have you missed some stuff! -- from the last Presidential election to the current world appeasement of Saddam Hussein (in the name of peace, of course) ... you've missed some amazing stuff.
I remember your favorite story about an old woman who was a client of yours, who had stopped voting at age 90 because "she didn't want to encourage the sons-a-bitches any more." I've been going back to the songs of Tom Lehrer and the writings of Mark Twain and Jonathan Swift, just to remind myself that political insanity has a long and noble history. That's the toughest lesson of aging, as you knew before I did (being older), that man's quest includes reinventing the wheel, generation to generation, because so precious little is learned from history. We make the same mistakes but with bigger tools, so we can screw everything up more. Without a sense of humor, one could go crazy in the world today -- and it's your sense of humor, your affinity for dark laughter, that I miss most of all, Dick. I can hear you roaring about some politician right now, before recovering with two simple words, "That asshole." So it's just been more of the same since you left, Dick. More of the same.
Well, I just wanted to drop a line in case they have blogs wherever the hell you are now. In the sixties, would we have thought they'd have blogs, not to mention PCs and the Internet, at the end of the century? No way. I don't make predictions any more. Except, of course, this one: the human condition is the human condition is the human condition, and the playwright behind all this embraced more absurdity than the Becketts and Satres combined. But you know what makes life worth living? Mowing the lawn. I did that today, first of the season. The drone of the reel mower and the aroma of the clipped grass ... it doesn't get much better than this. I'm enjoying them while I can. Take care, buddy. Till next time, C.
3/10/2003 02:59:50 PM |
Hello Peace! Here's the kind of creative idea the world needs more of: "Israelis, Palestinians can "call over the wall" to one another by telephone . . . now, at no cost. ... Phone one another to begin Listening and building lasting relationships."
On NPR this morning, they interviewed participants and the results were quite encouraging. Check out the website of Hello Peace!
3/10/2003 11:23:56 AM |
On mowing the lawn I've done some stupid things in my life. Lord, have mercy! But now and again I actually do something smart. A couple of Springs ago I did something smart by abandoning my gasoline-fueled, gear-driven monstrosity of a "push" (i.e. try to keep up with the damn thing) mower and buying an old-fashioned mechanical "reel" mower like the one I used as a kid (see a history of the lawn mower). This was no small decision given the large size of our lot and its hilly layout but I've never regretted doing this.
I just got the mower out of the shed and gave it its first Spring workout. What I love about old reel mowers are two things: first, the sound! I love that sound. Beats the noise-polluting engine any time. And the smell. You can really smell the grass clippings when they aren't in competition with gasoline fumes. So I gave it, and myself, a brief workout with the first mowing of the season. I'll know it's time to sell the house and move into the city when I get tired of pushing my wonderful reel mower across the grass. It won't be this year.
3/10/2003 10:59:19 AM |
Live from the Sandbox Here's a Yahoo! pick that again demonstrates the new power of the Internet: a blog by a soldier in the Gulf. L.T. Smash: Live from the Sandbox. The site says, "L.T. Smash is a reserve officer in the United States Military who has been recalled to active duty and deployed overseas in support of Operation ENDURING FREEDOM. This website is an online journal of his adventures."
3/10/2003 09:12:12 AM |
Alexander Pope Today's light verse is by the King of the Rhymed Couplet, Alexander Pope.
3/10/2003 07:12:10 AM |
audblog audio post: Today's light verse by Alexander Pope.
3/10/2003 07:10:03 AM |
Sunday, March 09, 2003
Community One of the pleasant consequences of starting this blog has been meeting a number of writers with blogs of their own who have contacted me. We support one another by exchanging links. No doubt we even check out one another's writing. At the same time, writers are busy, solitary folk. Many, like myself, are not good "joiners." Our community, such as it is, is defined within the parameters of the working lives of writers.
Some have said that writing is lonely but I've never found this to be true. On the contrary, I am never so exhilarated or in touch with my better self than when the writing is going well. What I find lonely is the period after writing. What I find lonely is that empty space between the finished work and its re-emergence in a context that permits the possibility of readers. Nothing is more lonely than writing something that goes unpublished or unproduced. But this loneliness begins after, not during, the act of writing.
Writers understand this about one another. Writers understand the need for privacy and the need for small talk and when each is appropriate. Writers understand why we often don't like to discuss our work, how the work is best respected when it stands on its own. Writers understand the difference between the creative act and an act of analysis. Writers realize that the main reason we write is because we can't not write. Writers embrace writing as a religious, spiritual act in the fullest sense of the term. Writers understand the difference between doing hack work, which often is necessary to pay the rent, and doing real work, which often is necessary to maintain our sanity. We writers know ourselves as well as we know our characters. We usually are our characters -- all of them.
Thanks, fellow writers, for stopping by. May your work go well.
3/9/2003 10:25:48 PM |
Hamill on Sinatra Today I treated myself to some reading-for-the-joy-of-it and finished a slim volume I highly recommend, Pete Hamill's Why Sinatra Matters. More than a biography, Hamill puts the man and his music in the context of his background (Italian immigrant family), his times (Prohibition, the Depression, World War II), and his special artistry. This book is as good as the short Penguin biographies I've been enjoying lately and well could be placed in the series. Great reading for a lazy Sunday afternoon. Here are some reviews:
I never had the pleasure to see Sinatra live. I especially like his Capitol period with Nelson Riddle (covered nicely by Hamill), and the man (who, after all, had quite a reputation) seems more likeable here than in his often bad press.
He also did some fine movie performances, of course, From Here to Eternity and Manchurian Candidate being my favorites, but perhaps the Sinatra movie that captured my fancy most at the time was Some Came Running, both for its romantic portrayal of the boozing misunderstood writer (ah, sweet youthful delusion!) and the sexy sad comic character of Shirley MacLaine, who reminded me of my first young love in Berkeley. Our skin and bones grow faster than our hearts.
3/9/2003 03:45:41 PM |
Beginning screenwriters Spring begins the season for the major screenwriting competitions, and all of you wannabes out there should be polishing your scripts about now. But be careful! The screenwriting contest industry continues to grow, and you need to be aware of some hard facts about most contests.
Winning most screenwriting contests will have a minimum positive effect on your career goals. What winning any contest will do is give you some needed validation, help your ego, maybe put a little cash in your pocket, and get you a few readings. But you can easily get readings on your own (a fact!, yes, even without an agent). Few contests actually kick your career in the butt. And considering that the average entry fee now is $50, some folks are making money on these competitions.
One conest that will help you, however, is the Nicholl Fellowship in Screenwriting, and every serious screenwriting student should enter this every year (early "discount" deadline April 1, regular deadline May 1). This is a minimum student screenwriting goal: finish one script a year to enter in Nicholl. Oh yes, over 6000 wannabes will join you. But if you make the first cut, to about 100, your phone will start ringing with inquiries from agents and producers to see your screenplay. Nicholl is sponsored by the same people who give out the Oscars and it is a very big deal. Nicholl is really the only contest I recommend to my students as "a must." (Second would be Austin's Heart of Film competition. Information for this year is not online yet.)
Even winning Nicholl does not guarantee fame and fortune. There are 5 winners each year, and usually only one of these scripts becomes a movie. But the rest get agents, rewrite work (especially if they will move to L.A.), and the $25,000 prize. But there is at least one former Nicholl winner who is a waiter today, and many others surely who no longer are in the film business. It's tough.
Mike Rich and Max Adams (Finding Forrester and Excess Baggage) are recent success stories. Rich, interestingly enough, also entered his script at Austin -- and didn't even make the first cut! Adams, who won both Nicholl and Austin with her script, ended up being fired from the production team of her movie and to this day dislikes the movie they made.
It's a tough business and never gets easier. But if you have your heart set on conquering it, the place to begin is with Nicholl. Get that script ready before May 1.
3/9/2003 10:07:48 AM |
Langston Hughes Today's author of light verse is Langston Hughes.
3/9/2003 07:38:32 AM |
audblog audio post: Today's light verse by Langston Hughes.
3/9/2003 07:33:55 AM |
Saturday, March 08, 2003
Tom Lehrer update From Australia, an article about Tom Lehrer updating his attitudes and activities.
My earlier post on Tom Lehrer.
3/8/2003 10:47:24 AM |
Other Axis of Evil Wannabees by John Cleese (more politically incorrect humor from my email)
Bitter after being snubbed for membership in the "Axis of Evil", Libya, China and Syria today announced that they had formed the "Axis of Just as Evil", which they said would be more evil than that stupid Iran-Iraq-North Korea axis President Bush warned of in his State of the Union address.
Axis of Evil members, however, immediately dismissed the new Axis as having, for starters, a really dumb name. "Right. They are just as evil . . . in their dreams!" declared North Korean leader Kim Jong-il. "Everybody knows we're the best evils . . . best at being evil .. . we're the best."
Diplomats from Syria denied they were jealous over being excluded, although they conceded they did ask if they could join the Axis of Evil. "They told us it was full," said Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.
"An axis can't have more than three counties", explained Iraqi President Saddam Hussein. "This is not my rule, it's tradition. In World War II you had Germany, Italy, and Japan in the evil Axis. So, you can only have three, and a secret handshake. Ours is wickedly cool." International reaction to Bush's Axis of Evil declaration was swift, as within minutes, France surrendered.
Elsewhere, peer-conscious nations rushed to gain triumvirate status in what has become a game of geopolitical chairs. Cuba, Sudan and Serbia announced that they had formed the "Axis of Somewhat Evil", forcing Somalia to join with Uganda and Myanmar in the "Axis of Occasionally Evil", while Bulgaria, Indonesia and Russia established the "Axis of Not So Much Evil Really as Just Generally Disagreeable".
With the criteria suddenly expanded and all the desirable clubs filling up, Sierra Leone, El Salvador, and Rwanda applied to be called the "Axis of Countries That Aren't the Worst But Certainly Won't Be Asked to Host the Olympics".
Canada, Mexico and Australia formed the "Axis of Nations That Are Actually Quite Nice But Secretly Have Some Nasty Thoughts About America", while Scotland, New Zealand and Spain established the "Axis of Countries That Want Sheep to Wear Lipstick". "That's not a threat, really, just something we like to do", said Scottish Executive First Minister Jack McConnell.
While wondering if the other nations of the world weren't perhaps making fun of him, a cautious Bush granted approval for most axis, although he rejected the establishment of the "Axis of Countries Whose Names End in 'Guay", accusing one of its members of filing a false application. Officials from Paraguay, Uruguay, and Chadguay denied the charges.
Israel, meanwhile, insisted it didn't want to join any Axis, but privately world leaders said that's only because no one asked them.
3/8/2003 08:34:21 AM |
Allen Ginsberg Today's light verse author is Allen Ginsberg, who is practically an American icon. He begins, of course, as a major figure in the Beat literary movement. Here the place to begin is with what I consider to be the best history of the Beat literati, Aram Saroyan's short but brilliant book, a prose poem in its own right but unfortunately out of print, Genesis Angels: the Saga of Lew Welch & the Beat Generation.
Here are some Ginsberg links:
3/8/2003 06:28:18 AM |
audblog audio post: Today's light verse by Allen Ginsberg.
3/8/2003 06:26:04 AM |
Friday, March 07, 2003
Brave New World II Jeff Schwaner, editor and co-founder of greatunpublished.com, a print-on-demand company, did an interesting experiment with his wife, a poet who has published in such "institutional" journals as Poetry, The Hudson Review and The Virginia Quarterly. They compared the advantages and disadvantages to a poet of publishing a traditional way by entering contests with small presses that publish the winners versus using the new print-on-demand technology to publish oneself. The results may surprise you.
3/7/2003 10:35:02 PM |
Brave New World It's extraordinary how much and how quickly the relationship between writers and readers has changed and continues to change as a result of the digital revolution. From websites, blogs and online literary publications, to inexpensive print-on-demand books, the sweep of technology has made it easier than ever for writers "to exist" -- which is to say, for their writing to receive distribution -- and thus take the first necessary step toward finding an audience.
A wonderful essay puts some of this change in perspective. Katherine McNamara is the Editor and Publisher of Archipelago, an early and very respected online literary magazine. Her roots (as well as her husband's roots) are in traditional publishing, and she witnessed first-hand the transformation of publishing houses into commercial conglomerates more interested in profits than literary quality. Her essay about all this and more, Institutional Memory and the Promise of Electronic Publishing (pdf file), is highly recommended for anyone interested in the effect of the digital revolution on writers and publishing.
3/7/2003 09:04:15 PM |
Jonathan Swift Swift, like Tom Lehrer, comes to mind in political times like these. I especially recall the moment in Chapter Four of Gulliver's Travels when Swift shows us what ridiculous conflicts can lead to war (however, I do not think the conflict with Iraq is ridiculous):
"It began on the following occasion. It is allowed on all hands, that the primitive way of breaking eggs before we eat them, was upon the larger end: but his present Majesty's grandfather, while he was a boy, going to eat an egg, and breaking it according to the ancient practice, happened to cut one of his fingers. Whereupon the Emperor his Father, published an edict, commanding all his subjects, upon great penalties, to break the smaller end of the eggs. The people so highly resented this law, that our histories tell us, there have been six rebellions raised on that account; wherein one Emperor lost his Life, and another his crown. These civil commotions were constantly fomented by the monarchs of Blefuscu; and when they were quelled, the exiles have always fled for refuge to that empire. It is computed, that eleven thousand persons have, at several times, suffered death, rather than submit to break their eggs at the smaller end. Many hundred large volumes have been published on this controversy: but the books of the Big-Endians have been long forbidden, and the whole party rendered incapable by law of holding employments." Catching a bit of the U.N. debate on the car radio this morning, I was immediately reminded of Swift's argument between Big-Endians and Small-Endians. Has a single mind been changed during all this? Nations naturally pursue their selfish interests. We do, and so does Iraq's largest trade partner, France.
For all his biting political satire, or perhaps (to be more cynical) because of it, Swift remains largely "a children's author" today, the censored version of his masterpiece read (at least out of the classroom) more often than the full book. Here are some Jonathan Swift links:
3/7/2003 12:16:23 PM |
Addendum Earlier I listed some Iraq resources on both sides of the issue of war. Here are some additions.
3/7/2003 08:04:19 AM |
Drama critics Since today's light verse is about a drama critic, stories from my own career in theater came to mind. Here are a couple.
Perhaps the most memorable story didn't concern me at all. The daily newspaper's drama critic left a show at intermission and was followed back to his office by the play's director, who finally attacked him in the elevator. Made quite a story etc. and started a local debate about the drama critic's ethics. In his defense, he pointed out that he had seen a local production of this show on six different occasions over the past decade! He didn't need to watch the entire thing to evaluate it. Such a confession got my sympathy, believe me. He also was a fair newspaper critic. He didn't use the occasion to flash his own critical brilliance but rather remembered he was writing for a family newspaper and recommended the play, or not, accordingly and told why.
Drama critics for weekly alternative papers tend to toot their own horns more, using the occasion of a review to let everyone know how well read and brilliant they are. They don't make recommendations, they make pronouncements. I must admit that I once was one of them for a year, and although I championed some small ignored productions that deserved large audiences, I also panned large popular plays in ways that were self-indulgent.
Perhaps the worst example of this was my review of Brigadoon by our civic theatre. I began something like, "Here is a story about a town that comes to life once every hundred years. A reviewer should only have to see this play every century as well, and since I saw it in high school ..." I'm sure I thought I was quite cute, and I'm sure I thought the letters written in protest came from philistines. Fortunately, we all grow up. Or most of us do. I did. Mostly.
3/7/2003 07:43:12 AM |
audblog audio post: Today's light verse by E.B. White.
3/7/2003 07:20:24 AM |
E.B. White Today's light verse, which will be posted later today, is by E.B. White. In the meantime, here are some relevant links.
- Biography.
- Life and times. Resources from the New York Times (requires free registration).
- Quotations.
- More quotations, including:
- "Television hangs on the questionable theory that whatever happens anywhere should be sensed everywhere. If everyone is going to be able to see everything, in the long run all sights may lose whatever rarity value they once possessed, and it may well turn out that people, being able to see and hear practically everything, will be specially interested in almost nothing."
- The Elements of Style ("Strunk and White").
3/7/2003 02:26:59 AM |
Thursday, March 06, 2003
Progress A trickle of students to office hours today with questions and rewrites -- and I was happy to see that a few of the ones having trouble with the unusual "rules" of screenwriting have made significant breakthroughs. As one student said, "I've been worrying that I wasn't putting in enough background stuff but now I realize that I had way too much, it was slowing down the story." Ah, the beginner's love affair with backstory! It takes a while for many students to understand how incredibly efficient filmic storytelling is. They usually begin to "get it" after learning how to watch a movie as a writer, not a consumer. We practice this a lot in class -- which is not something I've learned how to duplicate in my online class. There's nothing like watching movie scenes in class and then analyzing them on the spot.
I believe I am the founder of the Johnny Cochran School of Screenwriting: "When in doubt, leave it out!"
3/6/2003 04:05:33 PM |
A little humor Got this in an email today, and I rather like it!
President George Bush is on a trip to several European countries. While visiting England, he is invited to tea with the Queen. He asks her what her leadership philosophy is. She says that it is to surround herself with intelligent people. He asks how she knows if they're intelligent. "I do so by asking them the right questions," says the Queen. "Allow me to demonstrate."
The Queen phones Tony Blair, puts him on a speaker phone and says, "Mr. Prime Minister, please answer this question for me. "Your mother has a child, your father has a child, and this child is not your brother or sister. Who is it?"
Tony Blair responds, "It's me, madam."
"Correct. Thank you and goodbye, sir," says the Queen. She hangs up and says, "Did you get that, Mr. President?"
"Yes ma'am. Thanks a lot. I'll definitely be using that!"
Upon returning home, he decides he'd better put some of his old friends to the test. He calls Dick Cheney first and says, "Hi, Dick, I wonder if you can answer a question for me."
"Why, of course, Mr President. What's on your mind?"
"Well, your mother has a child and your father has a child, and this child is not your brother or your sister. Who is it?"
Cheney hums and haws and finally asks, "Can I think about it and get back to you?" Bush agrees, and Cheney hangs up. Cheney immediately calls members of his staff and they puzzle over the question for several hours, but nobody can come up with an answer. Finally, in desperation, Cheney calls Colin Powell at the State Department and explains his problem.
"Now look here, Colin, your mother has a child, your father has a child, and this child is not your brother or your sister. Who is it?"
Powell answers immediately, "It's me, of course, you idiot."
Much relieved, Cheney rushes back to call Bush and exclaims, "I know the answer, sir! I know who it is! It's Colin Powell!"
And Bush replies in disgust, "Wrong, it's Tony Blair!"
3/6/2003 02:42:17 PM |
On the bus I'm a bus person. When I come to the Univ., I usually walk to a bus stop from my house or, if the weather is bad or I'm lazy, drive to a park-and-ride and catch the bus. The only time I drive to campus is when I have a lot of material to pick up as I will next Thursday when I collect about 25 thirty-page scripts.
Buses are great for writers. The bus is full of characters and idiosyncratic speech, both wonderful things for a writer to steal. About half the time I'm on a bus I find something I can use in my work later.
I don't see enough smiles on the bus. Most folks, of course, look distant, lost in their own thoughts, but there are more frowns than smiles, more evidence of people having terrible days than good days.
What is sure to liven up a bus ride is a kid. Talkative spontaneity, sure to get folks smiling. But sometimes the opposite, a screaming unhappy kid who can make the environment tense.
After I got to campus, I checked out my Spring classroom in the distant Science Building, and it's the worst case scenario. A small windowless room off the lobby with no high tech features, so I get to haul a TV-VCR all the way across campus once a week. How nice. Since the room is off the lobby, it might be noisy enough to have to close the door (no windows!) unless it's late enough in the day that the lobby is deserted.
At any rate, doesn't look like an ideal room. However, it also doesn't look as bad as a basement room I got once, which required 4 elevators to reach with the TV-VCR, and which was located next to a very loud opera rehearsal room. That room really sucked.
Office hours begin. Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.
3/6/2003 02:14:56 PM |
The Teaching Company Not yet a year ago, I discovered The Teaching Company, which produces audio University classes in lecture format. I've found some excellent lectures! I especially have enjoyed a series on Existentialism and another on the History of the English Language. I'm going through a Classical Mythology series at the moment. Modern British Drama is waiting in the wings.
The University professors who give these lectures are quite good, at least in the few I've listened to so far. I recommend this site to those looking for thoughtful taped lectures, and their catalogue is quite large. Check it out.
3/6/2003 09:17:42 AM |
Chomping at the bit Not too huge a reading load this morning -- might be able to sneak a little writing time in later in the morning, before I head off to the big U. If not, tomorrow certainly will be a writing day! And perhaps a bit of Saturday, too, before I panic and realize how much reading I have to do before Tuesday.
So it's mostly on automatic pilot, reading papers and returning them and getting another stack to read. Student final projects are due next week, finals the week after. I should have my grades in on the 20th. I don't go back until April 1. Hmm, starting class on April Fool's Day. I'll have to think about that.
My spring class is in the Science Bldg across campus, which is either a bad thing or a good thing. It's a bad thing if it means I have to push the TV-VCR cart across campus but it's a good thing if it means, as one student suggested, I have a very high tech room with my own TV-VCR in the classroom. I have to go check it out.
I'm preparing a new edition of my screenwriting book, which I hope to have ready for next fall. Next winter for sure. It will be the last edition before I retire, I'm sure.
I feel good about turning down the Screenwriting Expo gig in Los Angeles. I'm too old to play the Hollywood game.
3/6/2003 07:26:39 AM |
audblog audio post: Today's light verse by Lord Bowen.
3/6/2003 07:10:03 AM |
Wednesday, March 05, 2003
The Merry Minuet This is one of the few songs sung by Tom Lehrer that he didn't write himself. It was written by Sheldon Harnick. The Kingston Trio later recorded it as well. It comes to mind because of "the state of the world," in particular the lyric:
The whole world is festering With unhappy souls The French hate the Germans, The Germans hate the Poles Italians hate Yugoslavs South Africans hate the Dutch And I don't like anybody very much
Ah, what would we do without the ability to laugh at this crazy world? Link to entire song.
3/5/2003 04:19:27 PM |
Teaching Although this is crunch time for a college teacher, it's also a very exhilarating time because both my University and online classes are so good. The former is very lively in discussion, and the latter has more than average very good screenwriters. Typically, the online students are better screenwriters -- I believe this is so because the selection process is different. The online class, not being accredited, is a workshop that only those with a serious interest in screenwriting would take, whereas the University class meets a number of requirements for students who enter with more curiosity than strong interest. Also the online students tend to be older, more mature, and more experienced in writing, often coming to screenwriting from another professional writing discipline.
At any rate, both are very enjoyable this term, which definitely helps during crunch time. During a term last year my University class was so lifeless that I seriously considered retiring. Then the next term brought lively students, always a joy to teach, and my enthusiasm returned. I get poor online classes, too, usually by most of the students disappearing into cyberspace. But that didn't happen this term, with only one student "disappearing."
I'm also working at the Univ. with two students in one-on-one writing & conference sessions. Both are excellent screenwriters.
So it's been a great term, and crunch time shouldn't be so bad after all.
3/5/2003 04:06:50 PM |
State of the world Understand that my speculation about the state of the world is simply that -- speculation by someone interested in history. I hope I am wrong about many things I feel in my gut these days.
As for what I do know, I hope I made that clear in my short story, The Epistemological Uncle (one of my favorite titles). In other words, not much!
3/5/2003 02:53:33 PM |
Sorrows of cyberspace Near the end of my online class chat today ... and everything froze up! Had to reboot, and when I returned to the chat room, there was no chat applet. So maybe the room itself was the problem and not my computer. At any rate, I left the students stranded and I wonder what it looked like on their end. Needless to say, a frustrating experience, but fortunately they seldom happen (knock on my wooden head).
3/5/2003 02:39:34 PM |
Was Nixon right? News today of another suicide bomber in Israel. When you are in conflict with those who readily die for their cause, and you are not willing to die in turn for yours, you are at a considerable disadvantage in the long run. Pacifism is a nice concept but in practice it leaves much to be desired. Yes, you'll hear about Gandhi and the civil rights movement -- but the people who tell you this won't also tell you about the massacres of innocent "peaceful civil disobedient" folks to whom tyrants gave no consideration. I would venture to guess that the latter outnumber the former in the annals of world history.
There is an interesting example in our own history. This is related by the historian Daniel Boorstin in the first volume of his excellent trilogy, The American Experience. In 1755 in the western frontier of Pennsylvania, natives fed up with white encroachment of their lands began raiding and killing the settlers, including killing women and children. The settlers called to the colony of bring in forces to defend them. However, the colony was run by Quakers who were pacifists. Instead of troops, they sent messages understanding the native point of view and implicitly criticizing colonial policy in settling Indian lands. The massacre of settlers continued. Finally Benjamin Franklin stepped in, organized military defenses, and the killing of settlers stopped. Sometimes, it would seem, the only way to stop force is with force.
Nixon, according to one historian I read, believed that World War III would be in some fashion defined by the East v. the West. Moreover, he thought the East would win this great battle because the West, he thought, had lost its will to fight. The West was too comfortable, idealistic and in the end cowardly to defend its principles by force and violence if necessary. He worried about this great battle beginning during his watch, which was a motivation for his courting China, so the conflict wouldn't begin during his Presidency.
If the East has become Muslim extremists using the common tactic of suicide bombings, and if the West has no will to face the enemy head on and fight, which is what is suggested by the constant appeasement of Iraq (and Saddam Hussein himself seems to believe this), then are we seeing the beginning of the end of the West, of western civilization? Civilizations, after all, do not last forever. They come and go. They come and go. Maybe the great days of the West are over, and the pendulum of history is swinging away into new territory, where new civilizations, even radical Islam, will rise to become the dominate world climate.
Was Nixon right in his vision of history? A short story asking this very question is forming in my brain ...
3/5/2003 09:13:42 AM |
E.E. Cummings Several years ago I did a dramatic tribute to e.e. cummings, author of today's light verse, at the First Unitarian Church here in Portland (script here). This summer I'll be using the same format to do a dramatic tribute to Dorothy Parker. It's a staged reading format, written, produced and directed by myself, with musical help from the musical director at the church, and this is my annual short moment of coming out of retirement (almost) as a playwright.
3/5/2003 06:12:07 AM |
audblog audio post: Today's light verse by e.e.cummings.
3/5/2003 06:07:08 AM |
On the road Somewhere in the clutter of boxes of old manuscripts I have four volumes of a journal I began in high school and continued until I joined the Army. It's not a writer's journal -- it's the journal of a budding mathematician. In it I primarily strive to solve number theory problems that I pose for myself. However, as the years progress, the mathematical scribbling turns to prose, and to some god awful poetry. The most interesting sequence, perhaps, is the part of the journal I kept while being "on the road" in a grand hitchhiking adventure that had me thinking of myself as a Jack Kerouac character, thumbing from Berkeley to Louisville in order to see the Kentucky Derby. Although I made Louisville for Derby Day, I was flat broke and didn't see a horse race. I turned back and thumbed my way home to Southern California as quickly as I could make it.
I was 19. I should find the journal of the road trip and excerpt some of the more interesting entries here. I came across the journals while organizing my manuscripts last summer -- and stuffed it back into a box. But I read through them, first amazed at my passion for math at such a young age (at Cal Tech I would discover the limits of my mathematical creativity and since I had no desire to become an engineer or applied mathematician, I was left in a quandary about how to find creative employment in my life, never dreaming even then that I would become a writer), later fascinated by my youthful observations of the world while hitchhiking through it.
One end-of-day entry sticks in my mind: "another drunk, another queer tonight." Being picked up by the intoxicated and those who would sexually hustle you, both new experiences for me. I was picked up by a couple who wanted me to have sex with the wife, using a condom, so the husband could drink my semen and regain his potency. I was picked up by the evangelical who tried to bring me to Jesus -- and one of them, in fact, did drag me along to my first tent meeting. I was picked up by a moonshiner who introduced me to jar white lightening. For a while I was joined on the road by a toothless gray-haired woman (who knows how old she was? much younger than she looked, I suspect) whose visible skin was covered with tattoos, looking like something out of a circus, and whose speech I had a hard time understanding. I was picked up by a retired Army officer on a mission to invade the Soviet Union Rambo-style and bring this damn Cold War to an end. I presume I was picked up by some ordinary folks as well but I don't seem to remember them. A lesson in storytelling there!
When I have some time, I'll try to find those journals and put some excerpts here. They belong in my memoirs.
Speaking of which, I've thought about writing them. My working title would be It's All Material but I haven't thought of a good subtitle to go with it. The word "misadventures" has occurred to me. Or "education of." Or "miseducation of." Also "marginal writer," which is how I feel, a writer isolated out in the margins of literary culture. I have no idea if I'll ever get around to writing them, with so many other ideas cooking in me as well.
Maybe this blog is as far along on a memoir as I'll ever get.
3/5/2003 05:58:57 AM |
Tuesday, March 04, 2003
Addiction Tonight I learned that a young man I care about, the son of a dear friend, has entered a treatment center for heroin addiction -- for the fourth time in recent years. He's in his young 30s and stuck in the cycle of continuous relapse. He got the habit while working in the film industry in Hollywood, where he says the drug is everywhere.
As one who abused alcohol but didn't do anything about it until well into my 50s, I admire people in their 20s and 30s who try to deal with addiction. Relapse is part of the process, as natural a part of "recovery" as rewriting is to writing. But the key, I think, is getting one's head in the right place, so getting straight is an existential act and not a gesture to appease a spouse or parent or boss. It may be harder for younger folks to be in such an existential space.
At any rate, I wish him well and admire his tenacity in trying once again to get help and get straight. But in the end this is going to be, must be, a solitary trip. This is where I disagree with the politically correct line I was taught in treatment, that the addict is "powerless." The addict only becomes powerless when already under the influence of the drug of choice but the decision to take the drug in the first place is an existential act -- and the decision also can be not to take it. This is the opposite of powerlessness. This is extraordinary power over the consequences of one's behavior. The first step, the step reflecting a personal existential decision, power in its most essential sense, which is whether or not to take the drug, remains a solitary act of personal definition. This is how the addict can grab control of a life: by deciding never to let the physiological or psychological addiction kick in in the first place. This is not easy and takes considerable courage -- but it is not surrendering to powerlessness, it is taking charge of one's life.
3/4/2003 10:33:06 PM |
Office hour musings Nothing like quiet office hours to inspire staring out the window. In two weeks and two days, I should have my grades in -- and then I'll be chomping at the bit to get down to Eugene for the basketball tournament. In the meantime, I got my papers read today and with a good night's sleep I can do the same thing tomorrow.
There was an interesting program on "Talk of the Nation" today about the intellectual life on campus today. Most professors who were on the show believed it to be less vibrant and exciting than in previous decades, that today there was too much of an emphasis on college as job ticket.
I share this opinion. When I transfered from Cal Tech to Berkeley in 1959, I couldn't believe how exciting an intellectual environment I'd entered -- even after Cal Tech, a considerable intellectual environment in its own right. But Bekeley, which had not been politicized yet (this is pre-free-speech movement), was gloriously chaotic and anarchistic with tables and speakers everywhere, spouting every opinion, esoteric and strange, known to man. It was so exciting that I immediately stopped going to classes and hung out on the streets, where all the real idea-swapping seemed to be going on. Berkeley at this time was anything but dull! It was crazy and challenging, and a large part of every day was reading some book or other so you could argue about it later.
Berkeley was a real turning point for me. I had my first significant love affair there, with a girl who broke my heart, and for a while I was "homeless" and surviving in a tree house (really a lean to within a fallen tree) in Strawberry Canyon near the Cyclotron. More than one ex-wife has commented that being so close to radiation had a permanent effect on my brain.
I joined the Army in Berkeley, which was a family scandal since I was a Navy brat. Only my dad understood (the Army was 3 yrs, the Navy 4 yrs) -- my mom thought it was the end of the world. I actually joined by default. I was living in the tree house, broke, and surviving on one meal a day I got with a meal ticket after hitchhiking into Oakland to talk to recruiters, timing this so I'd be done just before noon, when they gave you a meal ticket for a restaurant across the street. I talked to the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines and Coast Guard, taking every test available, and managed to stretch this survival strategy over several weeks before I ran out of options and it was put up or shut up time. An Army recruiter had a quota shortage in the Army Security Agency and since I had previous college, he wanted to fill it with me ... and I said, Why not? This easily spies are made.
This, of course, was a blessing because my military experience was spectacular, a year of it at the language school in Monterey studying Russian. August 3, 1959, I joined -- a date I'll never forget.
An interesting p.s. Later in Germany, in a PX, I ran into the first love affair woman who had a toddler with her that was the right age to be mine. She said she got married within months of our breakup, but I've often wondered if that kid was mine.
3/4/2003 02:53:23 PM |
audblog audio post: Today's light verse by Arthur Guiterman.
3/4/2003 07:42:22 AM |
Head above water Managing to keep my head above water thus far in early crunch time. A full morning of reading student scripts, and the same tomorrow morning, but I think I'll meet this week's deadlines. My own work is pretty much on hold until maybe Wednesday.
Saw The Life of David Gale, one of those thrillers that engrosses you when it's happening and then later is full of holes when you start analyzing it. I guess it doesn't really matter at the time you're watching it, though. As usual in this kind of movie, it's well acted and well produced, the weakest link being the writing itself.
Last year I taught 3 workshops at 2002 Screenwriting Expo in L.A. and I just received my invitation to join the faculty again. However, I think I'm going to pass. They don't pay me enough for money to be a reason to go, and the zoo-like atmosphere, while fascinating the first time around, ended up being a little depressing. I can take only so much of being around "Hollywood types" with all the hustle and scams going down. A Hollywood zoo like this is something I recommend my students see at least once, but I found so little rational sanity down there -- and I'm talking about the faculty by and large -- what with everyone trying to sell their special acre of screenwriting wisdom, it was more like a new car trade show than an educational environment. Too many sales people and not enough real teachers. If I were younger I suppose I could go down on a crusade, determined to bring some neutral observation into the chaos, but I'm too old and selfish now to be interested in that lonely battle. I just didn't find it very much fun, and if something isn't fun, why the hell do it? Well, there are other reasons, but none of them apply. So I am passing up the 2003 Screenwriting Expo. And I suspect all the years to come as well.
Here is my Report on the 2002 Screenwriting Expo, my most recent column at the Cyber Film School in Canada.
3/4/2003 07:01:00 AM |
Monday, March 03, 2003
Word Chowder The state of light verse is alive and well on the Internet. A wonderful online book that makes the case is Scott Emmons' Word Chowder. Does it make sense to call this first-rate doggerel? Well, that's what I'm calling it. Below are three audio examples, which will make you want to check out the rest of Scott's book.
3/3/2003 04:26:00 PM |
audblog audio post: Bonus! More light verse.
3/3/2003 04:14:42 PM |
Hank Ballard Hank Ballard died yesterday. He, with his group The Midnighters, was one of the musical heroes of my youth in the early 1950s. (See my essay Birthing Little Richard: Reflections on the Rise of Rock-n-Roll, Los Angeles, 1950-7.) I last saw him at an outdoor festival in the late 1980s, and he was terrific.
Here are some Hank Ballard links:
3/3/2003 11:53:35 AM |
Ogden Nash Today's light verse is by Ogden Nash. When I was growing up in the 1950s, there were three poets whose names were household words even in a home like ours where not a poetry book was to be found: Carl Sandburg, Robert Frost ... and Ogden Nash. It seems hardly a week went by without seeing a short verse of his in Reader's Digest or The Saturday Evening Post.
3/3/2003 06:54:26 AM |
audblog audio post: Today's light verse.
3/3/2003 06:50:27 AM |
Sunday, March 02, 2003
Iraq resources This is a blog about writing, not politics, and yet when war looms on the horizon, it affects us all. Perhaps you share the frustration I have with the media in turning everything into short sound bites. Here are some more thoughtful resources I've found on both sides of the Iraq issue.
3/2/2003 02:19:48 PM |
John Ciardi While an undergraduate at UCLA, I had the great pleasure to hear John Ciardi read, who is the author of today's light verse. I remember him as a great figure of a poet, robust with a deep voice. He read mainly from his recent translation of Dante's Inferno, and I was struck with how alive he made the verses compared to some earlier translation I had studied in class. He died in 1986. Here is a link to some of his quotations, including "A university is what a college becomes when the faculty loses interest in students."
3/2/2003 07:41:53 AM |
audblog audio post: Today's light verse.
3/2/2003 07:31:48 AM |
Saturday, March 01, 2003
March madness The first day of March announces the approach of March Madness, my favorite sporting events, the men's and women's NCAA basketball tournaments. This year I especially look forward to the madness because we have tickets to rounds one and two of the women's tournament in Eugene.
During a period in the 1980s when I was a bachelor I would go to a strange town during the first week of March Madness and rent a motel to watch all the early games, far from the telephone and other interruptions. A favorite motel for this occasion was outside of Hood River, overlooking the Columbia River gorge. Another was out on the desert in Fossil. I would go the first week to root for all the small college Cinderella teams before they got eliminated. I loved it when someone like Gonzaga or Boston College or Princeton upset a highly ranked team. I had a blast taking these solitary trips for early March Madness.
Today my two alma maters are playing each other, Oregon and UCLA, and early on the Ducks are creaming them. They need the win to get into the tournament.
I have no idea who will be represented at the women's tournament in Eugene but it would be nice to see a Stanford or other ranked team, as well as the underdogs.
March madness! I love it.
3/1/2003 01:54:24 PM |
audblog audio post: Today's light verse
3/1/2003 08:49:07 AM |
Priorities Now that I've outlived all my closest male friends, I'm feeling very "mortal" and what comes with that is an acute awareness of having too little time to do all the writing projects I want to do -- and with this, I must give each its priority and do them in the right order. For example, I have a number of novels in mind:
- The story of a man whose "dream retirement" is ended when he has to defend himself against a ghastly accusation (the novel I'm now working on, with the working title Character).
- Love in the Ruins, based on the screenplay I just drafted, a tragic love story set against 9/11.
- The Navy Wife, a fictionalized story of my family with my mother as the protagonist (both my parents are dead, the only way I could do this).
- Something based on my Army experiences as a Russian Linguist when the Berlin Wall went up, perhaps based on my screenplay in progress, Hitler's Blue Movie.
- Something based on the last 30 years here in Portland, Oregon, probably a personal story rooted in the arts and how local arts organizations often get the shaft as cities grow; or perhaps something more grandiose, an epic story set here. I should leave town before I write this.
- A new idea, fresh and exciting, with the working title Gods of Juniper County, to build more on a fictional terrain I've already defined in a number of plays and stories, retelling classical mythology in the small town environment.
So what order do I do this in? I doubt if I have enough coherent years in me to finish all these projects. I have to give considerable thought to which comes next, after I finish Character.
3/1/2003 06:51:30 AM |
|
|
| |
_ _The Writing Life
|
|
|